At 10:55 AM +1000 11/25/02, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
Floating point fills me with fear.
If it makes you feel better, C# does not require overflow
detection on floating-point operations. FP overflow results
in +/-INF, underflow results in zero, and undefined is NAN.
Only
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Floating point fills me with fear.
If it makes you feel better, C# does not require overflow
detection on floating-point operations. FP overflow results
in +/-INF, underflow results in zero, and undefined is NAN.
Only integer overflow detection is required, and then only
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 9:20 AM -0500 11/24/02, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, David Robins wrote:
> >> When's the long double "KNOWN ISSUE" going to be fixed? What's the work
> >It's (at least partly) a packfile alignment thing. I think if you look in
> >t
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:33:23PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > .NET has exception-throwing versions of its math operations. If you do
> > an add of two 8-bit integers and the result overflows, you should get
> > an exception (if you've used the "ch
At 10:33 PM +0100 11/24/02, Florian Weimer wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
.NET has exception-throwing versions of its math operations. If you do
an add of two 8-bit integers and the result overflows, you should get
an exception (if you've used the "check overflow" versions of
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> .NET has exception-throwing versions of its math operations. If you do
> an add of two 8-bit integers and the result overflows, you should get
> an exception (if you've used the "check overflow" versions of the ops)
Actually, I thought about implementing
At 8:07 PM +0100 11/24/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote:
"Iacob Alin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This might be a stupid question, but are this datatypes going to be
PMCs?
And a related question: What about trapping integer arithmetic?
Sorry for the ignorant question: This
At 9:34 AM + 11/23/02, Jerome Quelin (via RT) wrote:
Well, the topic says it pretty much: befunge now supports the push and
pop instructions builtin in PerlArray PMC, and I can get rid of my own
crafted version of push and pop in Parrot Assembly.
Fear, cause now I'll be able to find even more
Florian Weimer wrote:
"Iacob Alin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This might be a stupid question, but are this datatypes going to be
PMCs?
And a related question: What about trapping integer arithmetic?
Sorry for the ignorant question: This does mean what and implying that
and whatsoever?
At 1:46 PM +0100 11/24/02, Florian Weimer wrote:
"Iacob Alin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This might be a stupid question, but are this datatypes going to be
PMCs?
And a related question: What about trapping integer arithmetic?
That'll be done with the standard exception handling mechanism
At 9:20 AM -0500 11/24/02, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, David Robins wrote:
When's the long double "KNOWN ISSUE" going to be fixed? What's the work
around, just to build a perl with NV==double? I've looked around, can't
find anything about it except in KNOWN_ISSUES (only match
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, David Robins wrote:
> When's the long double "KNOWN ISSUE" going to be fixed? What's the work
> around, just to build a perl with NV==double? I've looked around, can't
> find anything about it except in KNOWN_ISSUES (only match in RT is
> "Parrot_sprintf-related stuff"). Sc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brent Dax) writes:
> We have to--otherwise we can't have the self-modifying parser Larry
> desperately wants.
That's funny. I wondered precisely why I'd been working on self-modifying
parsers in C.
--
10. The Earth quakes and the heavens rattle; the beasts of nature flock
toge
Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without varargs macros this is not really simple. (IIRC they are
> introduced in C99, but are in gcc for years now).
Indeed, C99 standardized them, but in a way that differs from GCC.
"Iacob Alin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This might be a stupid question, but are this datatypes going to be
> PMCs?
And a related question: What about trapping integer arithmetic?
15 matches
Mail list logo
