# New Ticket Created by "Sean O'Rourke"
# Please include the string: [perl #17070]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17070 >
Perl arrays allow accesses to negative out-of-bounds indices without
complaining or
>Ok then, [perl #16934] is unvalid, it should be removed from rt unless
>we want its syntax as an alternative to the correct way.
The removal process looks like:
set patch status to "Rejected" (and make sure to send an email
with a reason)
Change ticket state to resolved.
-R
Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Jeff wrote:
--snip--
> What this code is trying to say is "don't run the parser tests, because
> they're unmaintained". So probably something like
>
> grep !m{t/parser/} glob "t/*/*.t"
>
> would suck less. Maybe with a note about why it's
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Jeff wrote:
> In attempting to figure out why tests in languages/perl6 aren't running,
> I came across something of an oddity in t/harness.
>
> > my @tests = @ARGV ? @ARGV : map { glob( "t/$_/*.t" ) } ( qw(compiler rx) );
>
> Apparently designed to loop through just compiler/
On 6 Sep 2002 at 11:15, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> I've been told that my patch #16937 (which changes ld_shared from the
> hard-wired wrong value of -shared to $Config{lddlflags}, which is the
> variable designed in perl5 for this precise use) breaks cygwin. But in
> the current state of affairs, w
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 09:03:43AM -0700, Mr. Nobody wrote:
> While Apocolypse 5 raises some good points about problems with the old regex
> syntax, its new syntax is actually worse than in perl 5. Most regexes, such
> as this one to match a C float
Wrong list. You want the second door down the h
In attempting to figure out why tests in languages/perl6 aren't running,
I came across something of an oddity in t/harness.
> my @tests = @ARGV ? @ARGV : map { glob( "t/$_/*.t" ) } ( qw(compiler rx) );
Apparently designed to loop through just compiler/ and rx/ directories,
yet there are also bui
While Apocolypse 5 raises some good points about problems with the old regex
syntax, its new syntax is actually worse than in perl 5. Most regexes, such
as this one to match a C float
/^([+-]?)(?=\d|\.\d)\d*(\.\d*)?([Ee]([+-]?\d+))?$/
would actually become longer:
/^(<[+-]>?)\d*(\.\d*)?(<[Ee]>(
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:24:47PM +, Jason Gloudon wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Jason Gloudon
> # Please include the string: [perl #16308]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16308 >
>
>
>
> This a
Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > Ok, with the alignment hack now in (see resources.c) and lots of various
> > and sundry portability fixes, it looks like we're on our way to turning
> > the tinderbox a lovely shade of green.
>
> AARGH! It appears I spok
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 1:39 PM +0200 9/6/02, Josef Hook wrote:
> >On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> >> At 1:40 PM +0100 9/5/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >> >I believe applying the patch is the right thing, because it's progress
> >> >on where we are, but I th
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 07:37:48PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:32:27PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, with the alignment hack now in (see resources.c) and lots of various
> > > and sundry portability fixes, it loo
# New Ticket Created by Peter Gibbs
# Please include the string: [perl #17067]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17067 >
Mike's changes to integrate the external and selfpoolptr flags
have resulted in the on_f
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:01:13PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
>>#17026 was reverted by committing minor print changes.
> It has been reverted, but not in the way you describe:
Ah, thanks for doing the research work.
> I would prefer not to be the committer to f
14 matches
Mail list logo
