[COMMIT] Stack rework

2002-07-03 Thread Melvin Smith
Heads up for internal hackers, General stacks and control stacks are no longer circular. They are now terminated at both ends with NULL pointers. A "stack" now points to the top of the stack, not the base. This simplified stack handling as well as the GC tracing, but in one case, stack_entry()

vmgen

2002-07-03 Thread John Porter
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/vmgen/ (Sorry if this has been mentioned before...) -- John Douglas Porter __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com

Re: [netlabs #758] [PATCH] Fixes for example programs

2002-07-03 Thread Robert Spier
>Perhaps it got mangled? Can you send it to me as an attachment? Attachments can also be sent to the tracker. They're handled better now. -R

[netlabs #760] Parrot_warn doesn't work with a NULL interpreter

2002-07-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Josh Wilmes # Please include the string: [netlabs #760] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://bugs6.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=760 > Parrot_warn was modified a while back to allow for a NULL interpreter. However, since

Re: Perl 6 Summary

2002-07-03 Thread John Porter
[restricted to -internals, since that's the only one I'm on] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Oh yes. John Porter suggested that 'maybe Damian should write > [the grammar]?'. Which leads me to postulate an analog to Godwin's > Law, tailored to the perl 6 process, stating that at some point in any > th

Re: init_method_t for coroutines and subs?

2002-07-03 Thread Melvin Smith
At 09:51 PM 7/3/2002 -0400, Josh Wilmes wrote: >I know there was some talk about this extra "address" parameter recently, >but i'm not sure what the upshot of it is. Right now, tcc is complaining >loudly because the init functions for parrotsub and parrotcoroutine don't >match the init_method_t t

init_method_t for coroutines and subs?

2002-07-03 Thread Josh Wilmes
I know there was some talk about this extra "address" parameter recently, but i'm not sure what the upshot of it is. Right now, tcc is complaining loudly because the init functions for parrotsub and parrotcoroutine don't match the init_method_t type in the _vtable structure. What's the deal

Re: [netlabs #758] [PATCH] Fixes for example programs

2002-07-03 Thread Josh Wilmes
This patch doesn't want to apply for me: patching file examples/assembly/fact.pasm Hunk #2 FAILED at 35. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file examples/assembly/fact.pasm.rej patching file examples/assembly/hanoi.pasm Hunk #2 FAILED at 110. 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects t