If no one has any objections, I am planning on adding the undocumented
opcodes to pdd06_pasm.pod. For the most part, I am just going to copy the
pod documentation from the various *.ops files to pdd06. For those
opcodes without documentation or which are confusing, I'll try to contact
the author
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [netlabs #758]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://bugs6.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=758 >
Fixes to various of the PASM examples in light of recent changes in the
assembler.
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [netlabs #757]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://bugs6.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=757 >
This code:
A:# prints "a"
print "a"
end
doesn't assem
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover
# Please include the string: [netlabs #754]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://bugs6.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=754 >
This patch fixes the lookback ops to work properly when given negative
offsets, an
At 9:45 PM +0100 7/2/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 05:42:10PM +0200, Josef Höök wrote:
>> I've been thinking abit on howto implement multidimensional arrays and
>> i found that its quite tricky :). I'm currently thinking of having
>> a structure that contains a data pointer
At 5:14 PM -0400 7/2/02, Simon Glover wrote:
>On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>> At 2:37 PM -0500 7/2/02, brian wheeler wrote:
>> >I saw this was a TODO item in core.ops.
>>
>> Applied, thanks.
>>
>> Tests, from anyone, would be much appreciated.
>
> Will these do?
Absolutely. Than
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 2:37 PM -0500 7/2/02, brian wheeler wrote:
> >I saw this was a TODO item in core.ops.
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
> Tests, from anyone, would be much appreciated.
Will these do?
Simon
--- t/op/string.t.old Tue Jul 2 16:59:23 2002
+++ t/op/string.t
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 05:42:10PM +0200, Josef Höök wrote:
> I've been thinking abit on howto implement multidimensional arrays and
> i found that its quite tricky :). I'm currently thinking of having
> a structure that contains a data pointer and its location in every
> dimension something like
At 2:37 PM -0500 7/2/02, brian wheeler wrote:
>I saw this was a TODO item in core.ops.
Applied, thanks.
Tests, from anyone, would be much appreciated.
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski
At 5:42 PM +0200 6/27/02, =?latin1?Q?Josef_H=F6=F6k?= wrote:
>I've been thinking abit on howto implement multidimensional arrays
>and
>i found that its quite tricky :). I'm currently thinking of
>having
>a structure that contains a data pointer and its location in every
>di
At 1:07 PM -0700 7/2/02, Larry Wall wrote:
>Are you sure Ruby isn't just using dynamic variables? My information may
>be old, but that's all it seemed like to me. A certain amount of confusion
>naturally arises in the Ruby world because of the absence of explicit
>declaration, so the name bindin
At 9:05 AM +0100 7/1/02, Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
>Hi.
>Some questions I got when start looking to PMC's:
>
>- Is there planned a set PMC? If not, a parrot application can't create
> it's own PMC?
Yup, there's a planned set, but I don't think we've ever put down a
list of the minima
Are you sure Ruby isn't just using dynamic variables? My information may
be old, but that's all it seemed like to me. A certain amount of confusion
naturally arises in the Ruby world because of the absence of explicit
declaration, so the name binding rules get to be rather complicated.
In fact,
Doing volunteer work is so often a thankless task (and in many cases
one that gets unwarranted abuse from random passers-by) that I wanted
to take a moment to publically thank both Bryan Warnock and Piers
Cawley, for perl 6 list summaries past and present. They're the
single most visible piece
Can you add a test as well?
--Josh
At 14:37 on 07/02/2002 CDT, brian wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw this was a TODO item in core.ops.
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> --- core.ops 1 Jul 2002 17:18:04 - 1.176
> +++ core.ops 2 Jul 2002 19:41:44 -
> @@ -2074,9 +2074,9 @@
>
> =
I saw this was a TODO item in core.ops.
Brian
--- core.ops1 Jul 2002 17:18:04 - 1.176
+++ core.ops2 Jul 2002 19:41:44 -
@@ -2074,9 +2074,9 @@
=item B(inout STR, in INT)
-Remove $2 characters from the end of the string in $1.
+=item B(out STR, in STR, in INT)
-TODO:
--
On 02 Jul 2002 09:56:46 +010
pdcawley summed:
> Ruby iterators
>
>Ruby interators were the subject of Erik Steven Harrison's post, which
>also referred to 'pass by name' and 'the Jensen Machine', and wanted to
>know 'the Perl 6 stance on the matter'. Nobody has yet stepped u
On 02 Jul 2002 16:35:02 +0100 Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've done that for the register stacks, and I'll do the same for the
>other stacks unless somebody spots a flaw in my logic and points out
>that the GC will catch it...
No, your logic is correct, stacks are still
outside
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might want to modify register stacks too. I currently have a
> band-aid on it that just doesn't free stack chunks which works in
> all but the weirdest cases.
I've done that now. I also just realised that the st
Jeff sent the following bits through the ether:
> It runs strange code because it depends upon partially-deprecated code.
> Try 'set P0[2], 1' and 'set I0,P0[-2]'...
OK, when will we get set P0[2], P2? Is it because the semantics aren't
defined yet? Do we copy or leave references? I really need
20 matches
Mail list logo
