> > - None of the JIT ports implement it. This will save work.
>
> As long as my JITed jumptables are fast.
If you like coding assembly :-)
>
> > - It is in general impossible for an optimizer to determine
> > where the branch targets are if you allow registers as
> > branch
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
> G'day all.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:44:49AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > Ah. Hmmm. Well, we're already attaching some metadata to ops in a
> > different way--that's what the op and inline keywords are doing. For
> > metadata that use param
This one got dropped too, and maybe this isn't the right place for
this anymore.
Index: TODO
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/TODO,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 TODO
--- TODO29 Jan 2002 22:13:33 - 1.9
+++
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 03:24:58PM +1000, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
> G'day all.
>
> This patch introduces a new op parameter type "inconst", which is like
> "in" except that it only produces const versions of the op (i.e. it
> will not take values from registers).
Should it be all one keyword, or
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:11:31PM +0200, Marco Baringer wrote:
> Jason Gloudon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So thus far, goto ADDRESS(X) means set the program counter to the pointer value
> > X.
>
> ok, but i find this highly counter-intuitive.
I used to use this. I kept my own return add
I also recommend: http://www.parrotcode.org/
Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
>
> On 19 Apr 2002, Alberto Manuel [ISO-8859-1] Brandão Simões wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'm thinking to use Parrot to be the 'virtual machine' for a
> > specification language developed at Minho's university. Probably,
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, this is incorrect. goto ADDRESS should go to an absolute address,
> period. It's for use in those times when you *have* an absolute
> address--for example when you've just fetched the address of a
> subroutine from a symbol table.
but what do i put
On 19 Apr 2002, Alberto Manuel [ISO-8859-1] Brandão Simões wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I'm thinking to use Parrot to be the 'virtual machine' for a
> specification language developed at Minho's university. Probably, it
> will have two languages syntax (an for historic reasons, and another
> (VDM-SL)
Hi all!
I'm thinking to use Parrot to be the 'virtual machine' for a
specification language developed at Minho's university. Probably, it
will have two languages syntax (an for historic reasons, and another
(VDM-SL) because it is a standard). Why Parrot? Well.. I like perl and
would like to conn
Hi,
We are compiling some esql files(.ec ) files using "purify" with the -g option.
The problem which we are facing is that the log files that are generated after running
the purified executable shows some error of the sort as given under :
==
Mike Lambert wrote:
> Undoing the patch in resources.c seems to fix the problem.
>
> Changing:
> ((Buffer *)buffer)->buflen = req_size;
> to:
> ((Buffer *)buffer)->buflen = size;
> makes it work again.
Just for interest, the problem here is that the rounding is always up to the
next multi
Also slowing down 0.0.99 so that 0.1.0 has atleast 2-3 times speed up over 0.0.99 :"))
|I don't see "World Domination" or "Nervous Breakdown" in there anywhere.
Andrew J Bromage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> G'day all.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 07:06:04AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>
>> If I'm going to be doing tail call optimization
>> (and I can't call it scheme if I don't) then my first thought was as
>> follows.
>>
>> # This is a tail call
>>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
