[possible PATCH] More gcc warnings: -Wcast-align (fwd)

*nudge* I know Dan's obviously got more important things to worry about and Simon's also busy elsewhere, but did anyone else have any thoughts? I include my query of last week below. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:36:41 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL

Re: scheme-pairs?

At 06:04 PM 1/22/2002 +0100, Juergen Boemmels wrote: >Hello, > >some time ago (before I went to holidays) I posted a patch >implementing Schemepairs, but I didn't get any comments about this. I >am wondering what is the reason for this. Hi, I think this happens to everyone at some time on these l

scheme-pairs?

Hello, some time ago (before I went to holidays) I posted a patch implementing Schemepairs, but I didn't get any comments about this. I am wondering what is the reason for this. Was the patch too long, or too outdated (I can resend a newer version of the patch agains current anoncvs). Or is the

[PATCH] Quiet more gcc warnings about shadowing [APPLIED]

This patch quiets another gcc warning about shadowing variables. I've already applied it. diff -r -u parrot-cvs/runops_cores.c parrot-andy/runops_cores.c --- parrot-cvs/runops_cores.c Mon Jan 14 15:03:52 2002 +++ parrot-andy/runops_cores.c Tue Jan 22 11:43:10 2002 @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ INTV

[PATCH] Generate xxx_class_init prototypes too [APPLIED]

This quiets a few more gcc warnings. (I've already applied it.) diff -r -u parrot-cvs/classes/pmc2c.pl parrot-andy/classes/pmc2c.pl --- parrot-cvs/classes/pmc2c.pl Mon Jan 21 20:04:53 2002 +++ parrot-andy/classes/pmc2c.plTue Jan 22 11:43:10 2002 @@ -249,6 +249,9 @@ unless (exists $fla

Re: HP-UX state

On Mon 21 Jan 2002 19:25, Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > > perl vtable_h.pl > > make: *** No rule to make target `include/parrot/rxstacks.h', needed by >`test_main.o'. Stop. > > This exists (and has done for a couple of days) but