If floats are so non-portable, why do we have a constant table section for
them? Or is that temporary?
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The attached patch addresses the non-printf related casting problems between
opcodes (which are currently doubling as PBC chunks in addition to just
being an opcode number) and INTVALs. Handles sizeof(opcode_t) <=>
sizeof(INTVAL). Includes a couple other casting fixes.
Casting between opcode
On 11 Oct 2001, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 21:23, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At 09:12 PM 10/11/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > >On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 20:49, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > > At 08:25 PM 10/11/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > > > >Since we're passing guilt around
Argh, my mailer crashed as I sent this, so I don't know if it went out.
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 21:23, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 09:12 PM 10/11/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> >On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 20:49, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > At 08:25 PM 10/11/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > > >Since
At 09:12 PM 10/11/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 20:49, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At 08:25 PM 10/11/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> > >Since we're passing guilt around, there's an equate of '*' which is the
> > >current PC...and I didn't document it. You can do
> > >
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 20:49, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 08:25 PM 10/11/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> >Since we're passing guilt around, there's an equate of '*' which is the
> >current PC...and I didn't document it. You can do
> > set I1,*
> >and it will set I1 to the current PC. It do
At 08:25 PM 10/11/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>Since we're passing guilt around, there's an equate of '*' which is the
>current PC...and I didn't document it. You can do
> set I1,*
>and it will set I1 to the current PC. It doesn't allow any math,
>though. I thought about hooking up
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 19:49, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 06:05 PM 10/11/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> >I'm guilty.
> >
> >I needed address arithmetic for Jako subroutine support. I also needed
> >a quick and easy way to detect it in the .pasm file. I use the square
> >brackes as a quotation de
I was playing with Parrot and wanted a basic random numbers implementation. Just in
case anyone else wants it too, here are the appropriate diffs and test file. It
seemed logical for rand to return a real number between 0 and 1 instead of having any
reliance on RAND_MAX. Any other ideas?
--
At 06:05 PM 10/11/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>I'm guilty.
>
>I needed address arithmetic for Jako subroutine support. I also needed
>a quick and easy way to detect it in the .pasm file. I use the square
>brackes as a quotation device to make it easy to parse. Eventually
>we will need an as
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bryan C. Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Assignment, not comparison. (Plus formatted for coding standards)
>
> Committed. The tests should really have caught this,
At 03:06 PM 10/11/2001 -0700, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>It seems to me that we should look at cons before writing Yet Another Perl
>Build System. (i haven't used it myself, so I don;'t know if it's good
>or not). For reference: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/
It's GPL, so we couldn't ship with it unless
At 06:13 PM 10/11/2001 -0700, Wizard wrote:
>I noticed that many of header files use the following format:
>#if !defined(H_GUARD)
>Is this preferable to "#ifndef"?
I find it clearer to read.
> I always thought that the defined()
>function was only for more complex tests.
Doesn't really matter-
I noticed that many of header files use the following format:
#if !defined(H_GUARD)
#define H_GUARD
Is this preferable to "#ifndef"? I always thought that the defined()
function was only for more complex tests. Additionally, the defined()
function may not be entirely portable (it might be missing
It seems to me that we should look at cons before writing Yet Another Perl
Build System. (i haven't used it myself, so I don;'t know if it's good
or not). For reference: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/
--Josh
At 12:18 on 10/11/2001 PDT, Robert Spier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> | I'm OK req
Dan, Sam, All --
> > Did we put a patch into parrot that lets you fetch the current PC
and store
> > it in an integer register? I seem to recall someone did, but I can't find it.
>
> That's the '@' thing I was talking about making a doc patch for. I then
> realized that I didn't understand it w
i just checked basic_opcodes.c but i can't see anything like that...
but i found something that confused me:
parrot_assembly.pod says:
jump tx:
Jump _to_ the address held in register x
branch tx
Branch forward or backward by the amount in register
x. (X may be e
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Did we put a patch into parrot that lets you fetch the current PC and store
> it in an integer register? I seem to recall someone did, but I can't find it.
That's the '@' thing I was talking about making a doc patch for. I then
realized that I didn't u
Did we put a patch into parrot that lets you fetch the current PC and store
it in an integer register? I seem to recall someone did, but I can't find it.
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski
Here it goes... another simple parrot example.
By the Way... jsr is not yet implemented? Or I didn't know how to use
it? Just can't we do:
jsr THERE
end
THERE:
And... what's the argument to return? I didn't understand...
Thanks
Alberto Simões
mdc.pasm
Descripti
At 12:18 PM 10/11/2001 -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
>| I'm OK requiring a C compiler and a build tool for a platform. It's a C
>| compiler and perl 5 that I don't want to require. (Rather nasty
>| bootstrapping issues there... :)
>
>This makes things a lot harder. Suddenly we're
>re-implementing m
| I'm OK requiring a C compiler and a build tool for a platform. It's a C
| compiler and perl 5 that I don't want to require. (Rather nasty
| bootstrapping issues there... :)
This makes things a lot harder. Suddenly we're
re-implementing make. (in C)
Speaking of re-implementing make, I just
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bryan C. Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assignment, not comparison. (Plus formatted for coding standards)
Committed. The tests should really have caught this, so I'm going to
do some work on them to make them more comprehensive...
Tom
--
Tom Hug
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/kbuild/cml2-paper.html
Here is a simple script (I hope it works) to grep instructions that
are not implemented.
Cheers
Alberto
--
| Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://numexp.sourceforge.net |
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
$file2grep = "docs/parrot_assembly.pod";
$opcode
Assignment, not comparison. (Plus formatted for coding standards)
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: strnative.c
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/strnative.c,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 strnative.c
--- s
On Monday 08 October 2001 12:09 pm, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
> Supercedes the previous one.
Patch withdrawn.
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 05:04 PM 10/11/2001 +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:59:56 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> >At 06:10 PM 10/10/2001 -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> >>Any interest in using something less painful than Make for this? I was
> >>thinking of Cons, myself...built in Perl 5 (which we are a
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:59:56 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>At 06:10 PM 10/10/2001 -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
>>Any interest in using something less painful than Make for this? I was
>>thinking of Cons, myself...built in Perl 5 (which we are already requiring
>>you to have), and much more friendly t
All --
I don't have time to go into all the details right now, but I am working
on unifying all the stuff that process through opcode_table,
basic_opcodes.ops, etc.
I'm writing some Parrot::* Perl modules for reading and processing the
files, and reworking how everything connects up.
I'm hoping
At 02:41 PM 10/11/2001 +0100, Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes wrote:
> One more example... this time to calculate the maximum common
> divisor.
>
> One more question... does jsr working? I can't use it...
Nope. Soon, though.
> And, finally... can anybody explain the argum
I'm working on a semi-spike implementation of this, I'll post it up here for
comment when I have it ready so I don't go too far down the wrong road.
On 10/11/01 5:03 AM, "Simon Cozens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 05:13:21PM -0700, Zach Lipton wrote:
>> I was thinking abo
One more example... this time to calculate the maximum common divisor.
One more question... does jsr working? I can't use it...
And, finally... can anybody explain the argument to return?
Thanks.. Cheers
--
| Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
At 06:10 PM 10/10/2001 -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
>Any interest in using something less painful than Make for this? I was
>thinking of Cons, myself...built in Perl 5 (which we are already requiring
>you to have), and much more friendly than Make.
Don't forget that our requirement for perl 5 is ul
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 05:13:21PM -0700, Zach Lipton wrote:
> I was thinking about configure and was wondering why we have to keep
> everything all in one file. Why not create a config/ directory (or something
> like that) and have a set of .cm files (ConfigureModule) that do the actual
> work, u
35 matches
Mail list logo
