Re: PDD 4, version 1.2.

2001-07-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 04:28 PM 7/3/2001 +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote: >By the way, the _Garbage Collection_ book is very worthy, but like >Neitsche, "it gets a bit boring after a while." [*] Truer words were never said. The table of contents could almost read: . . . Chapter 6: Same as chapter 5, only different Chapt

Any other comments on PDD 4?

2001-07-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
If not, I'll post the version with the edits I've got and be done with it. Dan --"it's like this"--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy

Re: PDD 4, version 1.2.

2001-07-03 Thread Dave Mitchell
Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ouch. I have quite often had applications that would use several hundred MB > now. If I would need double that, then that is going to hurt. I am not > familiar with copying collector GC, does anyone have a pointer to any > papers etc. The basic operation o

RE: PDD 4, version 1.2.

2001-07-03 Thread NeonEdge
Here's a reference to the Bartlett 'mostly-copying' GC collector. ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/DEC/WRL/research-reports/WRL-TR-88.2.pdf Hans Boehm also has a decent GC reference page with links to Bartlett's, but his GC is mark/sweep. http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/index.html Grant M

Re: PDD 4, version 1.2.

2001-07-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 03:18 PM 7/3/2001 +0100, Graham Barr wrote: >On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 10:15:02AM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > DS> We're going to use a copying collector. When the string gets > > DS> copied as part of a compaction run things'll

Re: PDD 4, version 1.2.

2001-07-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:15 AM 7/3/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DS> We're going to use a copying collector. When the string gets > DS> copied as part of a compaction run things'll get cleaned up > DS> appropriately. (Not that there's really any cle

Re: PDD 4, version 1.2.

2001-07-03 Thread Graham Barr
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 10:15:02AM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DS> We're going to use a copying collector. When the string gets > DS> copied as part of a compaction run things'll get cleaned up > DS> appropriately. (Not that there's

Re: PDD 4, version 1.2.

2001-07-03 Thread Uri Guttman
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> We're going to use a copying collector. When the string gets DS> copied as part of a compaction run things'll get cleaned up DS> appropriately. (Not that there's really any cleanup to do in that DS> case) Granted the destination s

Re: PDD 4, version 1.2.

2001-07-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 06:16 PM 7/2/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DS> At 09:07 PM 7/2/2001 +0100, Graham Barr wrote: > >> I for one use s/^...// quite often in the knowledge that it is > optimized to > >> just move a pointer and not cause a copy of