> What about leaving the flora aund fauna and using a name
> like they call ships?
> They always got names of females or towns...
>
> I suggest:
>
> PISA
>
Um... that sounds perilously close to "Piece Of". Am I alone on this one?
__
Matt Youell
Dave Storrs schrieb am 2001-04-27, 12:07:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Johan Vromans wrote:
>
> > Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Starting with 'P' is useful so we can keep our acronyms such as PMC and
> >
> > PERIL (hi Tom!).
> >
> > -- Johan
>
> < ACCENT=ENGLISH>
>
"David L. Nicol" wrote:
i'm swearing off sort-by-subject. Sorry.
Damien Neil wrote:
>
> sub foo {
> my Dog $spot = shift;
> my $fh = IO::File->new("file");
> $spot->eat_homework($fh);
> }
>
> Even with the object type declared, the compiler can make no
> assumptions about whether a reference to $fh will be held or not.
> Perhaps the Poodle sub
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Right. What I'm thinking would be a good place to get to is a list of the
> functionality that the debugger needs to provide or have available to it
> from the interpreter, rather than the actual interface to the user. (Which
> is important, but a se
