Tags

2005-05-10 Thread nickg
Guys, Does it seem reasonable to clean up some of the tagged versions in the depot which have served their purpose? I would suggest: Remove: file_move_031023 help V1? (or rename to something more meaningful?) Rename: REL_0_0_5 -> RELEASE_0_0_5 (These tags would continue to be accessible by vis

Re: [PATCH] Cosmetic updates to MD5 library

2005-05-12 Thread nickg
Leo, Wow! That's quite a bit of JIT code that you've just rustled up! I'll have to wait until this evening before I can properly try it, but those results look real good! I guess comparison with the XS version is the 'fairest' (similar executable size and startup time), in which case we're abou

Re: [PATCH] Cosmetic updates to MD5 library

2005-05-12 Thread nickg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > > parrot -j ord 1.10 user 1.26 real # opt. build rev 8072 > > and another 20% by inlining the fast path of the array get (set_i_p_ki) > > 0.91 user 1.09 real # opt build rev 8076 I've written some files to go into ex

Re: Teapots!

2004-06-16 Thread nickg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > A week later, I've finally checked the new SDL Parrot code into CVS. Nice one Chromatic. I'm not sure whether the datafile ever did make it onto the mailing list! I got it by email, but Google doesn't seem to have it. Perhaps it looked like spam or a virus... I'll