Guys,
Does it seem reasonable to clean up some of the tagged versions in the depot
which have served their purpose? I would suggest:
Remove:
file_move_031023
help
V1? (or rename to something more meaningful?)
Rename:
REL_0_0_5 -> RELEASE_0_0_5
(These tags would continue to be accessible by vis
Leo,
Wow! That's quite a bit of JIT code that you've just rustled up! I'll have to
wait until this evening before I can properly try it, but those results look
real good! I guess comparison with the XS version is the 'fairest' (similar
executable size and startup time), in which case we're abou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> > parrot -j ord 1.10 user 1.26 real # opt. build rev 8072
>
> and another 20% by inlining the fast path of the array get (set_i_p_ki)
>
> 0.91 user 1.09 real # opt build rev 8076
I've written some files to go into ex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> A week later, I've finally checked the new SDL Parrot code into CVS.
Nice one Chromatic. I'm not sure whether the datafile ever did make it onto the
mailing list! I got it by email, but Google doesn't seem to have it. Perhaps it looked
like spam or a virus...
I'll
