On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Sean O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> A bit of Parrot bloggage where I didn't expect it
> http://lambda.weblogs.com/discuss/msgReader$3850
I especially liked this part:
"There is a tutorial at the main site and an O'Reilly book available."
The book
Oh, you technical people:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>FreeBSD 4.4 / gcc
>>Irix6.5 / MIPSPro
>Would those be working or not working? :)
The answer is, obviously, "Yes."
Now get back to work.
Whoops--that was someone talking to me!
John A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The third group that won't be happy with Perl 6 are those who program
> in a limited subset of Perl - so limited, in fact, that they will
> most likely be bitten by minor changes in the language, without the
> benefit of experiencing the major improvements that those ch
"Randal L. Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sam> No, "but" is syntactically equivalent to "and" in English. It
Sam> just implies that the second condition is not generally what
Sam> you'd expect if the first was true.
Randal> Maybe in the interest of huffman encoding, we could make
Randal>
Does one of these items not belong?
>From Exegesis 4:
This new turbo-charged 'smart match' operator will also work on arrays, hashes and
lists:
if @array =~ $elem {...}# true if @array contains $elem
if $key =~ %hash {...} # true if %hash{$key}
if $value