Probably, I'm just confused, but ...
doesn't
> RFC PSA Title
> --- --- -
> 16 bdb Keep default Perl free of constraints such as warnings and strict.
^
and
> 73 adb All Perl core functions should return objects
^
mean this
>
Well, generally, I try to keep my mouth shut and stay out of these
kinds of things, but I'd really like to see some more discussion on
this one. So, ...
It's not a wacko idea, imho; in fact, it could also work quite well
with a "Stop-and-Copy" semispaces-type GC, if Dan elects to go with
somethi
Dan Sugalski writes:
> I dunno. Color me unconvinced--I do use the <> enough in non-while context
> (and in non-implied while context) to make the whole idea of next feel
> rather... nasty. And $FOO.next? Yuck. Reading lines/records in is one of
> the most fundamental things one can do in a co
A. C. Yardley writes:
> taken off list. (I don't mean to arrogant the decisional authority
Erh, make that arrogate ...
/acy
David Grove writes:
> Probably not if it had scales, webbed feet, a hookbill, antennae, a furry
> coontail, and udders. Otherwise, if it looks like a camel at all, it's
> considered a trademark violation. I remember someone (whether at O'Reilly or
> not I don't remember) saying that, even if it l
This is, obviously, premature, but, since the list has been rather
inactive over the last week or so (and this stuff has been much on
my mind as of late), I thought I'd throw this out there, fwiw.
I'm probably all wet ("And that's, OK" :-), but, recently, I began
to re-review my copy of Jon Meyer
Ok, the idea of a master-apprentice program, where the wannabes,
while working with masters, sort-of cut their teeth on the docs, and
then move up in skills over time, has been mentioned a few times on
this list and discussed rather extensively on perl6-meta. Now, I'm
wondering, has a consensus o
Dan Sugalski writes:
> Consider yourself officially drafted. It's too late to run away... :-)
Affirm that, Sir! :-)
/acy
Dave Mitchell writes:
>> I've been meaning for a while to sit down and thoroughly go through sv.c
>> to understand and document it. So, consider sv.c 'grabbed'; if no-one's
>> done av.c and sv.c in the meantime, I may get round to them too.
> ^
> hv.c of course.
D
I found the below paper while digging around for some additional
information on register-based machines. I'm posting it because (1)
of Larry's remarks about the importance of
http://windows.oreilly.com/news/hejlsberg_0800.html and (2) others
have, in earlier posts, expressed an interest in additi
To add insult to injury (or maybe not, depending on your pov),
here's a bit more, but this one's from Microsoft's site:
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/ecma/
NOTE: "CLI Partition III - CIL (word, pdf)," a link to which is on
the bottom of the webpage, includes a description of their so-called
Simon Cozens writes:
> Any progress on this? I'd like to start drawing up something for the
> internal variables API soonish. Well, last month, actually, but soonish
> would do just fine. :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Simon,
>> Here (finally) is that list of SV functions. I ran out of time t
Please take me off your mailing list. I don't know how you got my address,
but I have no idea what you are talking about. Mrs. Yardley address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "The Perl 6 Summarizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL
13 matches
Mail list logo
