Thomas Wittek wrote:
>> Noone other than Mediawiki uses the Mediawiki syntax. I posit
>> that the reason is that that syntax blows chunks.
>
> I have to agree. 'bold and italic' is definitely not what I
> understand as an intuitive syntax.
Hi everyone,
I'd like to mention that the med
Thomas Wittek wrote:
>
> Good ideas. But maybe we should start a bit smaller ;)
> It might be a good idea to create a list of features separated in
> several increments (releases) to get a running system early.
Absolutely.
> I could imagine increments like "Parsing/Converting", "Storage
> backe
Michael Mathews wrote:
> This is the smartest suggestion I've yet seen on the subject, but, not
> being all *that* familiar with Perl6 Grammars (aren't they something
> like contextually-smart regexes?), can anyone give an example of Perl
> 6 code that uses grammars and can express some wiki-forma
o;
seems to be the most natural change in syntax, if
$WeReallyWantToAvoidTheBackslash ;)
I'm afraid though, it is also the most nasty one for parser-developers as you
cannot tell the difference between this and an expression very early...
???
Regards and many thanks for making Perl6!!!
--
Ud
