On Jun 11, 9:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonathan Lang) wrote:
> Rereading A03, I ran across the original reasoning behind why Perl 5's
> '?:' trinary operator became '?? ::' first, and then '?? !!'. Three
> reasons were given:
>
> * the '?' and ':' tokens are far too broadly useful to be gobbled up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Lazzaro) wrote in news:CB2CAEFE-F33C-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> This message is to open the perl6-documentation list. First things
> first, can we get a quick roll call of who is interested in this
> effort, at least in abstract principle? No point in having discussion
