Re: problem with register allocation

2003-08-01 Thread Kenneth Graves
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 22:46:29 +0200 From: Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I am trying to learn about continuations and Parrot. I hit a problem of register allocation. I don't know if it is a miscomprehension from me or a bug. Probably the former. Apparently P16 is used both

Re: [perl #23186] [PATCH] adding "yield" semantics to IMCC

2003-08-01 Thread Kenneth Graves
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 14:50:05 +0200 Kenneth A Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Inside the iterator, there are three differences compared to a function: > 1) Every register in use needs to be saved to the user stack. (Anyone > have a

Re: Should I target Parrot?

2003-08-21 Thread Kenneth Graves
From: "Tom Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 11:58:05 -0400 I'm sure you're all good Parrot advocates in here, so... If I post some requirements I have to support my language features, would you folks care to talk me into targetting Parrot. Is this the right group fo

Some questions about packfiles

2003-08-18 Thread Kenneth Graves
Is load_bytecode supposed to provide "do" semantics (reload the packfile every time the op is executed) or "require" semantics (load the packfile only if it hasn't been loaded already)? I think the only distinction at the moment would be whether the extra time of rereading the file is performed.

Re: [perl #23299] Dynamic type handling in IMCC

2003-08-15 Thread Kenneth Graves
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:42:22 +0200 Kenneth Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +| NEW { /*expect_pasm = 1;*/ } I'd rather not mess around with PASM mode. Patch welcome (if that&