On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 07:15 PM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
While I'm all for the macros (yeah, I know, debugger stepping issues
and all)
I don't get that. What debugger issues? I changed some vtable calls in
the iterator code and didn't see any differences during debu
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 04:29 AM, Adam Turoff wrote:
I've never come across a programmer who wishes he could do this
in C and have the compiler magically know what's what:
int spam (int spam, char **spam) {
int eggs;
double spam;
re
Simon Glover wrote:
Why not just use a macro?
# .macro fortytwo (A)
#set .A, 42
# .endm
#
# .fortytwo(I0)
# print I0
# print "\n"
# end
Simon
Shouldn't be The Answer a builtin?
Kay
Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 12:14 -0400 8/10/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
> "VL" == Vladimir Lipskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've committed a würgaround.
i get the english side of the pun. what does the german(?) side mean?
The german verb "würgen" means "to strangle", if I'm not mist
