lump everything together?
Since I'm in the 'numeric' camp, I would vote for full membership of the
compact array type in the set of perl types.
Cheers,
Doug Hunt
Baris wrote:
>
> Hi Karl,
> Thanks for your comments.
> I still think it would be a good idea to have a
sense to hack deeply into the perl core to add a new
fundamental type if everything useful that could be done with that type
required a separate module...
Just my $0.02
Doug
Christian Soeller wrote:
>
> Doug Hunt wrote:
>
> > But I would like to speak up in support of Baris
Jeremy Howard wrote:
> - Mathematica (combines functional, declarative, and procedural styles;
> implements memoization, lazy lists, and array notation)
> - Matlab (fast and simple array language)
> - C++ expression templates such as POOMA and Blitz++ (implicit looping and
> generalised slicin
