RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:34:17 -0800
Subject: Re: [perl #37841] build faild in src/embed.c line 373 MAP_FAILED
undeclared
On Dec 5, 2005, at 8:03, David Dyck (via RT) wrote:
checked out todays version and found the following build er
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 at 07:31 -0800, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT...:
From: Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:31:10 -0800
Subject: [perl #37906] socklen_t not defined
Hi David,
why does parrot expect socklen_t to be defined?
Since
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 at 08:52 -0800, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT...:
could you send your changes as a patch to me or to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my hack was not how anyone should implement it.
(I was just trying to get it to compile)
Could you additionally add your test results to PLATFORMS?
I tr
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 at 14:50 -0800, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Angel Faus wrote:
> : Could we please, please, please have bitwise operators be out of the
> : core. We expect that they are not going to be used by the average
> : user, so it looks fair to apply the
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 at 12:17 -0800, Michael Lazzaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 11:58 AM, Larry Wall wrote:
> > I'd even be willing to give up ´foo bar bazª meaning qw(foo bar baz)
> > for this.
>
> I can't see that right (MacOSX Jaguar) in the email; to me it looks
The first message had many of the following characters viewable in my
telnet window, but the repost introduced a 0xC2 prefix to the 0xA7 character.
I have this feeling that many people would vote against posting all these
funny characters, as is does make reading the perl6 mailing lists difficult
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 at 10:38 -0800, Michael Lazzaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I dunno anymore, maybe we need to rethink what place there is for
> public domain docs at all. Perhaps we just have a man page that says
> "buy the damn books, you cheapskate" and be done with it.
I trust you were joking, r
