RE: PL/Parrot

2006-07-14 Thread Butler, Gerald
Would it make sense to implement the PostgreSQL SPI interface as a set of Parrot PMC's; then ANY HLL on Parrot could use those PMC's? Or could the SPI be wrapped by PERL for example, and then the OTHER HLL's simply use the classes/objects of the PERL interface? -Original Message- From: D

RE: parrot and refcounting semantics

2005-04-29 Thread Butler, Gerald
Isn't there something like: { my $s does LEAVE { destroy $s } = new CoolClass; # ... do stuff that may throw ... } Or something like that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin D Kealey Sent:

RE: Events (I think we need a new name)

2004-05-14 Thread Butler, Gerald
How about: "tocsin" toc.sin( P ) Pronunciation Key (tksn) n. An alarm sounded on a bell. A bell used to sound an alarm. A warning; an omen. -Original Message- From: Gordon Henriksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL

RE: Events (I think we need a new name) - Parcel?

2004-05-14 Thread Butler, Gerald
I LOVE IT: "PARrot Container for Event Lobbing!!!" -Original Message- From: Andy Wardley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 7:36 AM To: Butler, Gerald Cc: 'Gordon Henriksen'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject

RE: Bit ops on strings

2004-04-30 Thread Butler, Gerald
If I may interject for a moment: -Original Message- From: Bryan C. Warnock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 9:08 AM To: Dan Sugalski Cc: Perl6 Internals List Subject: Re: Bit ops on strings On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 13:04, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I think left and right sh

RE: Bit ops on strings

2004-04-30 Thread Butler, Gerald
-Original Message- From: Aaron Sherman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:58 AM To: Butler, Gerald Cc: Perl6 Internals List Subject: RE: Bit ops on strings On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 09:47, Butler, Gerald wrote: > If I may interject for a moment: Let me start

RE: This week's summary

2004-07-29 Thread Butler, Gerald
Of course American and Right are synonymous! Just ask OUR WONDERFUL GOD (I mean President) GEORGE W. BUSH. He'll tell ya' -Original Message- From: Piers Cawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 6:49 AM To: Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTE

FW: Spilling problems

2004-08-05 Thread Butler, Gerald
Oops. Sorry, meant to post this to the list. -Original Message- From: Butler, Gerald Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:52 AM To: 'Dan Sugalski' Subject: RE: Spilling problems I hate to intrude on this discussion, but, I was wondering if anyone could give a brief explanation

RE: Spilling problems

2004-08-05 Thread Butler, Gerald
s? -- Gerry -Original Message- From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:15 AM To: Butler, Gerald Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Spilling problems [Cc'd back to the list, since it's of general interest] At 9:51 AM -0400 8/5/04, Butler,

RE: Low-level math op behavior

2004-08-24 Thread Butler, Gerald
So, would it have things like $i = $j /E $k $i = $j %E $k which would both throw and exception if $k == 0 whereas $i = $j / $k $i = $j % %k would not throw an exception and would instead return NaN -Original Message- From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tu

RE: Numeric semantics for base pmcs

2004-08-24 Thread Butler, Gerald
Shouldn't 4 also have potential to produce BigInt? -Original Message- From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Numeric semantics for base pmcs Okay, so: 1) We round to zero when going from float to int 2) Overfl

RE: Numeric semantics for base pmcs

2004-08-24 Thread Butler, Gerald
Oops. I meant BigNum. -Original Message- From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:47 PM To: Butler, Gerald; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Numeric semantics for base pmcs At 1:42 PM -0400 8/24/04, Butler, Gerald wrote: >Shouldn&

RE: Tight typing by default?

2004-08-25 Thread Butler, Gerald
It would also seem reasonable that *IF* the promotion checking requires any significant amount of resources that there be a non-promoting version/mode of the ops for calculations that are known a priori to not overflow (e.g. i = 0; i = i + 1; <=== Should be able to be designated *somehow* to not

RE: Numeric semantics for base pmcs

2004-08-25 Thread Butler, Gerald
BigNum is an arbitrary precision decimal number (Think BCD -- Binary Coded Decimal ala the Unix utility BC) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Numeric semantics for base pmcs On

RE: GCC for PARROT (GCC Compiling itself to PARROT, then compilin g all supported languages to PARROT from PARROT)?!?!

2004-03-22 Thread Butler, Gerald
OK, I think I'm starting to get a better picture of what needs to happen. Does this sound more reasonable? Java, C#, Fortran(???), (Managed???)C++, (Other languages with appropriate non-direct memory access) ==> GCC Parser ==> Parse Tree ==> Enhanced RTL (where e

Why use PARROT as the basis for Open Source Platforms (GNOME etc) ?

2004-03-23 Thread Butler, Gerald
I've created the following WIKI (http://www.vendian.org/parrot/wiki/bin/view.cgi/Main/WhyUseParrot) in response to Havoc Pennington's recent Opinion Article on Footnotes which advocates JAVA/JVM as the future of the Open Source Desktop. Please, feel free to check this out and respo

RE: Load paths

2004-03-24 Thread Butler, Gerald
-Original Message- From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Load paths At 6:32 PM + 3/24/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Dan wrote: >> At the moment I'm thinking of the load path as a

RE: Ulterior Reference Counting for DoD?

2004-03-25 Thread Butler, Gerald
How do you make the copy/move of the object from one location in memory and the update of the pointer to the pointer ATOMIC? If you don't, it doesn't matter how many layers of indirection you have, it will still be a problem ;^) -Original Message- From: Piers Cawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROT