nstead, but I admit that I don't fully understand
what :lex does)
* Add 'closure' to create a lexical closure ('immediate' but without
the call)
Thanks,
Andrew Parker
quot;bar". I say almost because you won't be able to call _block14
either :) Before you can call _block14 you need to bind it to an
environment using newclosure (notice that that is what it is doing for
_block15).
Andrew Parker
On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote
in a scope.
I'm not sure what is wrong. The solutions that I can think of for
this are:
* mangle variable names in PAST so that we can distinquish the scopes
from the var names
* change how PIR and LexInfos work to pay attention to the order in
which lexical vars are declared and used in scopes
Any ideas?
Andrew Parker
int that there was something lacking was
wrong. It is more that I didn't look enough and parrot has so much
that it was hard to find :P
Thanks for the patience and the help.
Andrew Parker
On Feb 12, 2008, at 8:00 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:27:27PM +0
t won't (or will take a lot of
hoop jumping).
Andrew Parker
On Feb 12, 2008, at 5:13 AM, Bob Rogers wrote:
From: Andrew Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:27:27 +0100
Hi all,
I was checking a couple of things in the compiler that I wrote and
put
toget
