tiger% ./parrot -t t/dynoplibs/myops_3.pir
0 print "neither here\n"
neither here
2 hcf
Segmentation fault
When run under a debugger, it looks like this:
(dbx) run -t t/dynoplibs/myops_3.pir
Running: parrot -t t/dynoplibs/myops_3.pir
(process id 15185)
Reading myops_ops.so
0 print
On Thursday 19 June 2008 12:13:40 Mark Glines via RT wrote:
> On Wed Jun 18 10:57:05 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Solaris10 with sparc, during the make process I get this:
> >
> > perl /home/phoebus3/ANJ/work/parrot/tools/build/pmc2c.pl --c
> >subproxy.pmc
> > Cannot restore overloadin
On Thursday 19 June 2008 20:33:31 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> In Perl 5, what is the value for $^O on your system? (I'd like to have
> it for doing a SKIP on the TODO passing test above.)
perses% perl -e 'print "$^O\n";'
solaris
- Andrew
--
Talk is cheap. Show me the code. -- Linus Torvalds
On Thursday 19 June 2008 15:33:14 Parrot via RT wrote:
> "src/packfile.c", line 351: warning: argument #1 is incompatible with
> prototype:
> prototype: pointer to char : "/usr/include/sys/mman.h", line 161
> argument : pointer to long
> "src/packfile.c", line 878: warning: argument
On Monday 23 June 2008 09:08:07 NotFound wrote:
> Here is the patch. It avoids the warning both in C and C++ with gcc.
Works fine for me, no warning.
It might be worth adding a comment into parrot.h to clarify that
PARROT_const_cast should *only* be used for c/v qualifier changes, and that
addi
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 17:55:42 NotFound wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Andrew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Here is the patch. It avoids the warning both in C and C++ with gcc.
> >
> > Works fine for me, no warning.
> > It might be wor
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 12:03:19 chromatic wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 July 2008 08:27:35 Andrew Johnson wrote:
> > Confirmed, those warnings have gone. I'm still getting loads of
> > "warning: statement not reached" but I'll work out how to suppress those
>
On Thursday 10 July 2008 13:12:41 NotFound wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Andrew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Except the src/pmc/nci.pmc line 486, there is not such line in the
> >> file, and I'm unable to locate the problem.
> >
> >
On Thursday 10 July 2008 10:44:51 NotFound wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Andrew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The other warnings I get on Solaris are just these:
> >
> > "src/stm/backend.c", line 969: warning: statement not reached
>
On Wed Aug 13 10:41:22 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does this patch help?
Almost, you just missed the executable itself (-o arg). This patch
works for me.
- Andrew
Index: solaris.pm
===
--- solaris.pm (revision 30211)
+++ so
The segfault occurs inside clone_key_arg() inside src/inter_call.c (at
line 871), which has the following leading POD description (committed by
chromatic who also committed most of the implementation):
Replaces any src registers by their values (done inside clone). This
needs a test for tailcalls
On Sun Jul 06 11:03:37 2008, japhb wrote:
>
> Better yet, we should replace the inherently insecure quicksort
> algorithm (insecure in the "vulnerable to algorithmic attack" sense)
> with a more secure mergesort like perl5 uses. IIRC, perl5's mergesort
> is also carefully crafted to be as sensibl
12 matches
Mail list logo
