New generational GC Scheme

2005-06-08 Thread Alexandre Buisse
Following google SoC and TODO item, https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Ticket/Display.html?id=33922, here is the scheme proposal for a new parrot GC (many thanks to leo for his help). = In order to allow more powerful GC schemes, we need to be

Re: New generational GC Scheme

2005-06-16 Thread Alexandre Buisse
Sorry for answering so late... On 6/8/05, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jerry gay wrote: > > i'm no gc expert, but here's my comments after discussions with > > alexandre on #parrot. > > > > On 6/8/05, Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: GMC for dummies

2005-07-25 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On 7/25/05, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still digesting it (and trying to bone up on GC algorithms at the > same time), but it does sound like it should work. I assume that > "forall (p -> q)" above really means "forall (q0 -> q where q0 == p)", > i.e. process all IGP entries from

Re: GMC release

2005-09-01 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On 9/2/05, Nattfodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ...but it should be fine as > long as you define GMC_GC_RUN (at least to see if it can run correctly > miniparrot)... err, it was GMC_NO_GC_RUN, of course. Now I'll really use some sleep :)