Hi Marton, Thanks for the reply.
Below last example (in the REPL), does `dd` not work on Pairs?
Or is this Indirect Object Notation at work?
[3] > :_
_ => True
[4] > dd :_
:_
Nil
[5] > dd _
===SORRY!=== Error while compiling:
Undeclared name:
_ used at line 1
[5] > dd :_:
No such method '
The code tried to do the same with `dd` as with `say`. There are two
differences:
* `dd`, as a kind of debug tool, doesn't assign any special meaning to
named arguments so it's more than willing to give a Pair back with a
colon syntax representation even if was understood as a named argum
