> On May 30, 2021, at 9:18 PM, yary wrote:
>
> This came up in today's Raku study group (my own golfing-)
>
> > ? (any(4,3) ~~ 3)
> True
> > ? (3 ~~ any(4,3))
> True
> > given any(4,3) { when 3 {say '3'}; say 'nope'}
> nope
> > given 3 { when any(4,3) {say '3'}; say 'nope'}
> 3
> > given any(
Good day Rakoons,
As you may have already heard, the Raku IRC channels have moved from Freenode
to Libera. I've written a small blog post about this[1], but not everyone may
have seen it. As such, I'm also writing on the mailing list to spread the word.
Additionally, some module authors may have
Nice checking! I opened https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/4386
-y
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 3:45 AM Bruce Gray
wrote:
>
>
> > On May 30, 2021, at 9:18 PM, yary wrote:
> >
> > This came up in today's Raku study group (my own golfing-)
> >
> > > ? (any(4,3) ~~ 3)
> > True
> > > ? (3 ~~ any(4
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 10:18:13PM -0400, yary wrote:
: This came up in today's Raku study group (my own golfing-)
:
: > ? (any(4,3) ~~ 3)
: True
: > ? (3 ~~ any(4,3))
: True
: > given any(4,3) { when 3 {say '3'}; say 'nope'}
: nope
: > given 3 { when any(4,3) {say '3'}; say 'nope'}
: 3
: > given
Thanks for the explanation, I think the docs (and Roast) also can be more
explicit on the difference between
$left ~~ $right
and
$right.ACCEPTS($left)
and
given ($left) { when $right { ... } }
and
... when $right;
ralph-if you are reading this, last week you went into detail about
In my opinion, the most consistent approach is to disallow any
autothreading of the argument to .ACCEPTS, such that 3.ACCEPTS(any(3,4))
simply returns False. I suspect the only thing that returns True for
that sort of argument is Junction.ACCEPTS(any(3,4)) and such. And we
can't autothread that,
