On 12/4/20 8:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
On 2020-12-04 20:28, Curt Tilmes wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:52 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users
wrote:
This is the C way, although it shows deleted printers as well:
#include
#include
int main() {
cups_dest_t* dests;
int nCount
El dom, 6 dic 2020 a las 10:09, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users (<
perl6-us...@perl.org>) escribió:
> On 12/4/20 8:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
> > On 2020-12-04 20:28, Curt Tilmes wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:52 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is t
Hi,
I'm afraid that I've done something wrong somewhere else... Changed it
all back to OpaquePointer and kept the same problem. So I must look into
it deeper and just use the Pointer instead.
Regards,
Marcel
ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
> I am a little late to this conversation, but `,=`
> looks a lot like `push` to me.
Yes that was my first impression, if you read ahead a bit in the
discussion you'll see it explained.
In summary: the = shortcuts all work in a precisely parallel way, so
@r
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 6:38 PM Ralph Mellor
wrote:
> > Zen slicing as a possible way of 'de-containerizing' :
> > https://docs.raku.org/language/subscripts#index-entry-Zen_slices
>
> A zen-slice only affects the single reference it's applied to.
>
> And it is a no op when applied to anything oth
