Can you provide some samples of what you are trying to match and
exclude? There might be alternative solutions.
I'm pretty sure you need to use single quotes for your example, as Raku
will replace the @_[0] before Perl has a chance to do anything with it.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020, 10:23 PM Paul Procacci wrote:
> https://github.com/niner/Inline-Perl5
>
> use Inline::Perl5;
>
> subset test of Str where EVAL "sub
So two example patterns are:
[\\u0009\\u000A\\u000D\\u0020-\\u007E\\u0085\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uE000-\\uFFFD\\u1-\\u10]*
[\\p{L}\\p{Z}\\p{N}_.:\\/=+\\-@]*
To note, the RE's themselves cannot be changed as they are fed externally.
Given that I'm stuck with these RE's which I believe are PCRE, I
Hi Paul,
I'm sorry, I don't understand.
Are you saying you're using Inline::Perl5 because you can't use the
"Perl compatibility adverb" :Perl5 or :P5 ?
https://docs.raku.org/language/regexes#Perl_compatibility_adverb
Is that what you mean when you say the "perl regex engine [in Raku] is
too old
Hi Bill,
Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/2624
" FWIW, the :P5 supports a Perl 5 like syntax from X versions ago (probably
about 5.8, I would say)."
The features I need are in perl 5.10 which the :P5 adverb doesn't provide.
Thanks,
Paul
On Fri, Nov
Thank you Paul!
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 8:57 AM Paul Procacci wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying.
>
> https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/2624
>
> " FWIW, the :P5 supports a Perl 5 like syntax from X versions ago (probably
> about 5.8, I would say)."
>
> The features
