Hi all,
I have an access violation on Windows for one of my classes and think it is
a bug, but not entirely sure about that.
Every now and then creating a class instance ended my script with error:
Process finished with exit code -1073741819 (0xC005)
The class looks like that:
class Knowled
El mié., 24 jun. 2020 a las 10:05, WFB ()
escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an access violation on Windows for one of my classes and think it
> is a bug, but not entirely sure about that.
>
> Every now and then creating a class instance ended my script with error:
> Process finished with exit code -1
Thanks JJ,
I am using Rakudostar on Windows and 2020.01 is the current released
version so far.
I will try to reduce the code a bit more but it is just one class
definition together with an instantiation. Not sure I can pack that in a
one liner, but will try.
The access violation comes probably f
On 22/06/2020 20:12, Joseph Brenner wrote:
> > Speculating wildly: could there be a need for a different type of >
function with different precedence?
I would suggest calling .any on the list, that gives you just the tight
preference you want; even if there were no .any method available on the
obje
> I would suggest calling .any on the list, that gives you just the tight
> preference you want; even if there were no .any method available on the
> object you've got, or you want a different function, you can .&mysub
That's a good thought. The code wouldn't read as nicely, though (the
syntax
The download page requires an update. You can get 2020.05.1 here:
https://rakudo.org/downloads/star/
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:11 AM WFB wrote:
>
> Thanks JJ,
>
> I am using Rakudostar on Windows and 2020.01 is the current released version
> so far.
> I will try to reduce the code a bit more bu
I evaluated Joe's code using Patrick's explanation of parentheses-less
parsing (in the REPL):
> say(so(any( eq any(;
False
> say any( eq any());
any(any(False, False))
>
Q1. Does it make any sense to call "any" on "any" (i.e. nested "any"
calls)? Could this anti-pattern be used to generate a
It does actually make sense to call any on any
say (1, 2, 3).any + (4, 5, 6).any
# any(any(5, 6, 7), any(6, 7, 8), any(7, 8, 9))
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:22 PM William Michels via perl6-users <
perl6-us...@perl.org> wrote:
> I evaluated Joe's code using Patrick's explanation of parenthe
You're quite correct Brad, so maybe I mis-stated my observation:
> any( eq any())
any(any(False, False))
> eq any()
any(False, False)
>
Would the first line of code above code (wrapping an 'eq' call inside
an any-junction, along with another any-junction) be written by a
Raku programmer? If so,
