Hi Joe, I tested the code you put up using the REPL, and I have to
start off by saying that I was unable to reproduce your results,
specifically where you creat the "@m" array. This could be a
REPL-specific issue, or a version-specific issue (mine is 2019.07.1
Perl 6.d):
mbook:~ homedir$ perl6
To
Hi William,
The line that has the important difference is where you put a `my` in
front of `%stash{'monsters'} = @monsters`. Probably a copy-paste error
or something like that.
>> my %stash> {}>> my @monsters = <> fingfangfoom>>
tingler>>> [godzilla grendel wormface blob fingfangfoom tingler]>>
Hi
Is perl6 totall renamed to raku?
regards
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:15 AM Fields, Christopher J
wrote:
> A few people had started a port of some BioPerl code to Perl6 a while ago;
> I tested this recently and it still passed tests.
>
> https://github.com/cjfields/bioperl6
>
> It should be ren
Well, internally many parts still have Perl 6 in them. Renaming those is...
an interesting task.
Online, most resources have been renamed, but some still need to be done. This
mailing list being one of them. Unfortunately, it is part of the crumbling
Perl infrastructure, so it's unclear wha
Hi Timo and thank you for the note.
Yes, since I was working in the REPL, I tried compacting Joe's code by
eliminating the "my %stash" line at the top, and adding "my" to the third
line.
I figured since Joe's code looked like a closure (curly brackets and all),
it wouldn't be an issue.
But the two
I have another question for you. Maybe it must be better done in another
thread...
But, there is a way to compile Raku code in a binary capable to run in a
system without a Raku installation?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:17 AM Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> Well, internally many parts still have Perl
There isn't currently a way to compile to a single file, but there was a
GSOC project that started on it.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 7:17 AM Aureliano Guedes
wrote:
> I have another question for you. Maybe it must be better done in another
> thread...
> But, there is a way to compile Raku code in a bi
Timo Paulssen wrote:
> The reason for that is that `my %foo{Bar}` is syntax for restricting
> the keys of the hash to a specific type (by default it's `Str(Any)`)
Hm.. That's certainly useful, I hadn't even gotten to wondering how to
do that yet.
> and giving a string instance ("monsters" in
William Michels wrote:
> Yes, since I was working in the REPL, I tried compacting Joe's code by
> eliminating the "my %stash" line at the top, and adding "my" to the third
> line.
I noticed the additional "my" in there, but I wouldn't have been able
to tell you why it was behaving like it was...