On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:49:39 -0700, ronaldxs wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:32:12 -0700, lloyd.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I did an experiment a while ago and found that string concatenation
> > in a
> > loop was Ο(n²) in rakudo. I asked about it on irc and jnthn explained
> > to me
> > that this w
Same, but with the new Telemetry module so you can see better what’s going on:
$ perl6 -MTelemetry -e 'for (1, 10, 100, 1_000, 10_000, 100_000) -> $limit {
snap; my $x; my $y = "x" x 100; $x ~= $y for 1..$limit }'
Telemetry Report of Process #79213 (2017-11-10T16:24:00Z)
Number of Snapshots: 7
N
Same, but with the new Telemetry module so you can see better what’s going on:
$ perl6 -MTelemetry -e 'for (1, 10, 100, 1_000, 10_000, 100_000) -> $limit {
snap; my $x; my $y = "x" x 100; $x ~= $y for 1..$limit }'
Telemetry Report of Process #79213 (2017-11-10T16:24:00Z)
Number of Snapshots: 7
N
This crash still occurs with rakudo 2017.10.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:10 PM, perl6 via RT
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This message has been automatically generated in response to the
> creation of a trouble ticket regarding:
> "segmentation fault while concurrently updating SetHash",
> a sum
# New Ticket Created by foehn
# Please include the string: [perl #132426]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132426 >
Dear Rakudo distributors,
Thanks for making Rakudo available. One piece of suggestion -maybe it
This crash still occurs with rakudo 2017.10.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:38 PM, perl6 via RT
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This message has been automatically generated in response to the
> creation of a trouble ticket regarding:
> ""impossible" undefined value in concurrent ENTER phasers",
> a s
Hello! Thanks for the report.
Are you referring to rakudo releases or rakudo star releases? Both don't come
with checksums, but rakudo releases *are* digitally signed.
Compare:
* https://rakudo.perl6.org/downloads/rakudo/
* https://rakudo.perl6.org/downloads/star/
So do we need checksums for bot
The tests in S32-array/adverbs. and S32-hash/adverbs.t (and all code snippets
in this ticket) are passing again. I'm closing this ticket as 'resolved'.
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:27:09 -0700, b...@abrij.org wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 06:28:34 -0700, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:23:57 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> > >
> > > This code shows the bug:
> > >
> > > zoffix@leliana:~$ perl6 -e 'm: multi foo ($) {"right"
This crash still occurs with rakudo 2017.10.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:10 PM, perl6 via RT
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This message has been automatically generated in response to the
> creation of a trouble ticket regarding:
> "segmentation fault while concurrently updating SetHash",
> a sum
This crash still occurs with rakudo 2017.10.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:38 PM, perl6 via RT
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This message has been automatically generated in response to the
> creation of a trouble ticket regarding:
> ""impossible" undefined value in concurrent ENTER phasers",
> a s
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Sorry for being ambiguous -- I was referring to the rakudo star releases. Yeah,
I guess it would be super if you sign or checksum the rakudo star releases, as
they are binary installers. Thanks again!
-- Original --
From: "Al
OK. I created this issue for rakudo star:
https://github.com/rakudo/star/issues/106
I'll mark this ticket as resolved. See the ticket linked above to follow the
actual progress on the issue.
🤗
On 2017-11-10 17:20:56, fo...@foxmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply.
>
> Sorry for b
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Sorry for being ambiguous -- I was referring to the rakudo star releases. Yeah,
I guess it would be super if you sign or checksum the rakudo star releases, as
they are binary installers. Thanks again!
-- Original --
From: "Al
14 matches
Mail list logo
