On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Zefram
> wrote:
>
>> The same goes for coercions from other enum types.
>
>
> This should be your hint. Enums *are* numeric, specifically Int.
> I don't know what language you are trying to force Perl 6 to b
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #130972]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130972 >
> Set.new((2,).Seq,3).perl
set((2,).Seq,3)
> Set.new((2,).Seq,3).perl.EVAL.perl
set(3,2)
Failu
Oops, this is mostly a duplicate of [perl #129015]. Sorry.
-zefram
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #130973]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130973 >
Coercion from List to Set mostly works as expected, returning a Set
containing the objects that
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #130974]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130974 >
> Set.new((:a)).perl
set(:a)
> Set.new((:a)).perl.EVAL.perl
Unexpected named argument 'a' passe
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #130975]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130975 >
> SetHash.new((:a)).perl
SetHash.new(:a)
> SetHash.new((:a)).perl.EVAL.perl
SetHash.new()
Fail
I wrote:
> Don't know which side of the trip
>is at fault.
On reflection, for pair syntax to have special meaning at the top
level of an argument list is an intentional feature of calling syntax.
It is therefore .perl that is at fault, in not taking account of
I wrote:
> Don't know which side of the trip
>is at fault.
On reflection, for pair syntax to have special meaning at the top
level of an argument list is an intentional feature of calling syntax.
It is therefore .perl that is at fault, in not taking account of
Hi all,
the debugger, Debugger::UI::CommandLine, does not step into modules I
use. I must be doing something wrong. Any ideas?
I am on Ubuntu and using Rakudo version 2017.01 built on MoarVM version
2017.01
Thanks,
--
Theo van den Heuvel
Van den Heuvel HLT Consultancy
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Theo van den Heuvel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the debugger, Debugger::UI::CommandLine, does not step into modules I use.
> I must be doing something wrong. Any ideas?
>
Same here.
I can add that I couldn't find a way to add a breakpoint in a module:
bp add absolute-p
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #130976]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130976 >
Coercing from List to Set, where the List contains a Pair element:
> (:a,3).perl
(:a, 3)
> (:a
Heyo,
the way the debugger works is by changing the compiler to generate code
that communicates with the debugger at every step.
That means that if you want a module to be debuggable, it has to be
compiled by the debugger's compiler, too.
There's apparently currently no way to just force a full
The 42 xx 999 case is fixed with
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/f190f241e0 .
Not having an Empty indicate the end can only be done by breaking at least two
spectests. Also:
(|(),) xx 42
would then hang. So this feels like something that cannot be fixed generally,
unle
I don't quite understand what's wrong with just
my $TheValue = $?FILE.subst(/.* "/"/, "" :g);
near the top of your module?
Thanks Timo,
sadly. The result is similar "Cannot add breakpoint to unknown file
...".
I had been trying to remove .precomp directories, but I seem to be
missing something somewhere.
Strangely I do get messages like the following
LOADING EVAL_1
+ EVAL_1 (1 - 1)
| CompUnit::DependencySpeci
On 03/10/2017 09:53 AM, Timo Paulssen wrote:
I don't quite understand what's wrong with just
my $TheValue = $?FILE.subst(/.* "/"/, "" :g);
near the top of your module?
Hi Timo,
Because it gives you "Use of uninitialized value $TheValue"
when you go to use it inside one of the "is export
Not with me it doesn't.
my $TheValue = $?FILE.subst(/.* "/"/, "", :g);
sub sayfn is export { $TheValue.say }
Could something else be wrong here?
cheers,
Theo
ToddAndMargo schreef op 2017-03-10 22:10:
On 03/10/2017 09:53 AM, Timo Paulssen wrote:
I don't quite understand what's wrong with just
ToddAndMargo schreef op 2017-03-10 22:10:
On 03/10/2017 09:53 AM, Timo Paulssen wrote:
I don't quite understand what's wrong with just
my $TheValue = $?FILE.subst(/.* "/"/, "" :g);
near the top of your module?
Hi Timo,
Because it gives you "Use of uninitialized value $TheValue"
when yo
Todd,
Apparently I don't understand your intentions. You said you wanted
constants globally available in your module.
Don't you want to use those constants? If so, how?
Hm. How does it do with "sub sayfn" commented out?
--
Theo van den Heuvel
Van den Heuvel HLT Consultancy
Hi All,
With the help if the guys on the chat, I wrote a nice X11
Clipboard module that will read and write to both X11
clipboards. And it uses "run" instead of "shell" so
a terminal is not required when running it from a "launcher"
http://vpaste.net/vprdG
-T
--
Yeste
Hm. How does it do with "sub sayfn" commented out?
On 03/10/2017 04:02 PM, Theo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Todd,
>
> Apparently I don't understand your intentions. You said you wanted
> constants globally available in your module.
> Don't you want to use those constants? If so, how?
>
On
# New Ticket Created by Daniel Green
# Please include the string: [perl #130979]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130979 >
[21:51] m: use CheckSystemDependency ( $name ) { say "lol" }
[21:51] <+camelia> rakudo-m
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:11:53 -0800, ddgr...@gmail.com wrote:
> [21:51] m: use CheckSystemDependency ( $name ) { say "lol" }
> [21:51] <+camelia> rakudo-moar f190f2: OUTPUT: «===SORRY!===Cannot call
> method 'List' on a null object»
> [21:51] that's meant to be "sub" instead of use
Golfed a bi
23 matches
Mail list logo
