[perl #128092] Optimizer 2+ leaks out native

# New Ticket Created by Elizabeth Mattijsen # Please include the string: [perl #128092] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128092 > uguexe++ reporting, sortiz++ for following up http://irclog.perlgeek.de/p6dev/20

[perl #128094] [JVM] Issues with rakudo-j after merge of branch 'relocateable-precomp'

# New Ticket Created by Christian Bartolomaeus # Please include the string: [perl #128094] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128094 > There are different issues with Rakudo on JVM after the merge of 'relocateable-

re-writing a for comments

Hi, In S05, I found: "Although the default |<.ws>| subrule recognizes no comment construct, any grammar is free to override the rule. The |<.ws>| rule is not intended to mean the same thing everywhere." I was looking for an example of a new rule to deal with comments. Any links? Or, can anyon

Re: re-writing a for comments

On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:54:42PM +0800, Richard Hainsworth wrote: : Hi, : In S05, I found: : "Although the default |<.ws>| subrule recognizes no comment : construct, any grammar is free to override the rule. The |<.ws>| : rule is not intended to mean the same thing everywhere." : : I was looking

[perl #128097] gist for ‘-’.IO is wrong (‘-’.IO.say)

# New Ticket Created by Alex Jakimenko # Please include the string: [perl #128097] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128097 > Code: IO::Handle.new(:path(‘-’)).path.say Result: "".IO OK, let's try "".IO Code: