[perl #77746] "[BUG] »,« doesn't produce a structure of parcels i"n Rakudo

2010-09-09 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #77746] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77746 > rakudo: my @a=;my @b=;for (@a »,« @b) »,« @a -> $a, $b, $c {say "$a $b $c"} rakudo 859

Re: Rakudo series operator interaction with +

2010-09-09 Thread Mark Biggar
On 9/7/2010 12:36 PM, Aaron Sherman wrote: Oddly, these two expressions have the same output: for 0 ...^ (3+4) -> $i { say $i } for 0 ...^ 7 -> $i { say $i } But this one prints the numbers 0 through 7 instead of leaving off the last number: for 0 ...^ 3+4 -> $i { say $i } It does the same

[perl #77738] Bug report.

2010-09-09 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Joe Rahmeh # Please include the string: [perl #77738] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77738 > 1. Rakudo version: This is Rakudo Perl 6, version built on parrot 2.7.0 r48768 2. C

[perl #77740] Bug report.

2010-09-09 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Joe Rahmeh # Please include the string: [perl #77740] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77740 > 1. Rakudo version: This is Rakudo Perl 6, version built on parrot 2.7.0 r48768 2. C

Re: [perl #77738] Bug report.

2010-09-09 Thread Hongwen Qiu
于 2010年09月09日 03:44, Joe Rahmeh (via RT) 写道: # New Ticket Created by Joe Rahmeh # Please include the string: [perl #77738] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. #http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77738> 1. Rakudo version: This is Rakudo Perl 6

Re: Rakudo series operator interaction with +

2010-09-09 Thread Moritz Lenz
Am 08.09.2010 14:53, schrieb Mark Biggar: On 9/7/2010 12:36 PM, Aaron Sherman wrote: Oddly, these two expressions have the same output: for 0 ...^ (3+4) -> $i { say $i } for 0 ...^ 7 -> $i { say $i } But this one prints the numbers 0 through 7 instead of leaving off the last number: for 0 ...

[perl #77748] [BUG] The type object of a typed array stringifies to just '()' in Rakudo

2010-09-09 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #77748] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77748 > rakudo: my @a of Int = (1,2,3); say @a.WHAT rakudo 859f2d: OUTPUT«()␤» huh * masak su

[perl #77750] [BUG] Internal Parrot error when parsing '::' as a sole term in Rakudo

2010-09-09 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #77750] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77750 > rakudo: say ::.^methods # rakudo 859f2d: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤ResizablePMCArray: Can't

[perl #77752] callframe.perl message is LTA

2010-09-09 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Paweł Pabian # Please include the string: [perl #77752] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77752 > [17:43] rakudo: callframe.perl # known_and_NYI or should I report it as TODO? in STD t

[perl #77754] [BUG] Null PMC access when calling .perl on callframe.my in Rakudo

2010-09-09 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #77754] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77754 > rakudo: say callframe().callframe(1).my.perl rakudo 859f2d: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in

Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words

2010-09-09 Thread Brandon S Allbery KF8NH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/8/10 14:24 , Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote: >> I do want the diffs back: its the only way I have to keep at least >> some idea of what is changing any why. > > We know that a lot of