Larry Wall wrote:
Or going the other direction, perhaps we're missing a primitive that
can produce a data structure with the type information stripped, and
then eqv might be able to determine structural equivalence between
two canonicalized values.
Often you still want to know the declared type
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #75368]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75368 >
actually, $i !~~ any(|$nth) should be the same as
!($i ~~ any(|$nth))iiuc
the
On Wed Sep 16 05:57:09 2009, masak wrote:
> rakudo: role A { method foo { self.Str } }; say A.foo
> rakudo a9ff30: OUTPUT«()<0xb6ace1c8>»
> * masak submits rakudobug
>
> I guess we're punning the role into a class here. Maybe that class
> should stringify to 'A()<0xb6ace1c8>' instead of no name
Here's something more along the same lines.
rakudo: enum One ; enum Two ; say &d;
rakudo 982e8e: OUTPUT«Contextual $*PKGDECL not foundcurrent
instr.: 'perl6;Perl6;Grammar;add_my_name' pc 44311
(src/gen/perl6-grammar.pir:79)»
for sure, it's a LTA error message.
Regards,
Shrivatsan
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #75370]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75370 >
Not sure if this should work:
09:39 < isBEKaml> rakudo: enum somenum ; my somenum $temp
Darren Duncan wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
>>
>> Or going the other direction, perhaps we're missing a primitive that
>> can produce a data structure with the type information stripped, and
>> then eqv might be able to determine structural equivalence between
>> two canonicalized values.
>
> Often yo
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #75376]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75376 >
rakudo: my class A {}; our class B is A {} # via jnthn++
rakudo 982e8e: OUTPUT«Lexical
Jon Lang wrote:
> Right. Still, there are times when duck-typing, flawed as it is,
> might be exactly what is needed to resolve the problem at hand. I
> forget who or in what context, but I vaguely recall someone posting an
> article here that proposed the use of £ in signatures as a modifier to
Author: sorear
Date: 2010-05-28 02:10:37 +0200 (Fri, 28 May 2010)
New Revision: 30878
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] clarify :ratchet behavior with input from pmichaud++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
===
On 2010-05-26, at 8:52 am, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:22:36AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
> : On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 00:53, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : > sub MAIN(:name(:$n))
> : > then $n has two names, 'name' and 'n', and we could consider all
> one-letter
> : > parameter names as s
10 matches
Mail list logo