Author: lwall
Date: 2010-05-21 09:15:36 +0200 (Fri, 21 May 2010)
New Revision: 30742
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
Log:
[Spec] :() is now always signature. Use foofix:[...] as t
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:55:31PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> There could be multiple ways forward:
>> 1) rewrite EnumMap in PIR - it's mostly a wrapper around PIR code anyway
>> 2) Add another bootstrapping stage: an "early" setting for traits, many
>> basic types and
On Thu May 20 05:41:19 2010, pawel.pab...@implix.com wrote:
> [14:36] rakudo: sub Str {}; say "test" ~~ Str; # how this
> should behave
> according to spec? compile error? compare to Str type or enter Str sub
> and
> compare to it's output?
> [14:36] rakudo 8292d4: OUTPUT«1»
> [14:36] <-- justat
# New Ticket Created by Richard Hainsworth
# Please include the string: [perl #75234]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75234 >
On its own, class B executes as expectedly:
class B {method n { return [~] gather
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #75230]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75230 >
rakudo: say 1 if 2 if 3 { say 3 }
rakudo e6863e: OUTPUT«13»
o_O
o!O
rakudo: say 1
Hi,
After lots of debates off-list (specially with BrowserUk), I got to the
following conclusions:
- Each OS thread runs a cooperative-event-scheduler where coroutines
might be enqueued.
- map returns the buffer immediatly and enqueues a coroutine to process
the data.
- Explicit parall
>
> Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod 2010-05-21 06:55:13 UTC (rev 30741)
+++ docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod 2010-05-21 07:15:36 UTC (rev 30742)
@@ -2540,7 +2540,7 @@
=ite
I thought I'd have a go at command-line parsing
(http://perlgeek.de/blog-en/perl-6/contribute-now-main-sub.html), and I've got
the basics, even though I keep trying to put P5isms in my regexes! (I even
found a bug, but it's already reported, RT 73608.)
I wanted to check that named regexes aren
Hi,
David Green wrote:
> I thought I'd have a go at command-line parsing
> (http://perlgeek.de/blog-en/perl-6/contribute-now-main-sub.html),
> and I've got the basics, even though I keep trying to put P5isms in my
> regexes!
> (I even found a bug, but it's already reported, RT 73608.)
Thanks
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #75244]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75244 >
rakudo: "\e"
rakudo c950de: OUTPUT«Unrecognized backslash sequence: '\e' [...]
std: "
# New Ticket Created by Prakash Kailasa
# Please include the string: [perl #75246]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75246 >
Please review the patch attached which lets hyper operators be used on
nested arrays
On 2010-05-21, at 12:26 pm, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> That's going to be a common first hurdle, I can see.
> I ran into the same thing writing a IRI parser. Here's a way you can do this:
> [using a Grammar]
Thanks -- I thought of trying that to see what happens. (Not that I absolutely
need it, but
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:59 PM, David Green wrote:
>
> I wanted to check that named regexes aren't in Rakudo yet -- I get "Useless
> declaration of has-scoped regex in a module".
>
>
>
That's going to be a common first hurdle, I can see.
I ran into the same thing writing a IRI parser. Here's a
13 matches
Mail list logo
