# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73214]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73214 >
rakudo: say '(foo' ~~ / '(' ~ ')' [foo] /
rakudo 5e5969: OUTPUT«Unable to parse _block
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73218]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73218 >
rakudo: sub foo() { try { return 42 }; return 5 }; say foo
rakudo 5e5969: OUTPUT«5»
Also tested the install from SVN [1] and it also worked like a charm.
WARNING !! only install from SVN if instructed or you feel lucky
[1]
http://padre.perlide.org/trac/wiki/Download#Moredetailedinstructionformanualinstallation
2010/2/21 Víctor A. Rodríguez (Bit-Man) :
> Hello everybody,
>
> som
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73236]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73236 >
rakudo: say 0. # also by diakopterbot
rakudo 6867a5: OUTPUT«No app
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73232]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73232 >
std: my Any %.x=3,%.x;
std 29917: OUTPUT«ok 00:01 109m»
rakudo: my Any %.x=3,%.x;
r
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73238]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73238 >
rakudo: say 0x # diakopterbot
rakudo 6867a5: OUTPUT«-1»
ok
* masak s
# New Ticket Created by Bruce Keeler
# Please include the string: [perl #73244]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73244 >
The attached patch is also available in the 'grammar' branch of my
github fork (bkeeler
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73230]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73230 >
rakudo: my Hash $x; $x[1] # by diakopterbot
rakudo 6867a5: OUTPUT«No applicable candid
Hi Bruce,
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 17:48, Bruce Keeler wrote:
> On 3/2/10 2:53 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
>>
>> Victor (>):
>>
>>>
>>> Why it asks for Opendir.pir instead of Opendir.pm ?
>>> Any clue ?
>>>
>>
>> Short answer: Rakudo has regressed and doesn't support loading .pm
>> modules at the moment.
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #73234]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73234 >
rakudo: say Block ~~ Code
rakudo 6867a5: OUTPUT«1»
rakudo: Block.()
rakudo 6867a5:
rakudo: say 0.
00
rakudo 5e5969: OUTPUT«Divide by zerocurrent instr.:
'infix:' [...]
nice! 3 different bugs
the exact error changes with the number of extra 0's you have!
rakudo: say 0.000
Thanks Carl,
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 07:53, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> Victor (>):
>> Why it asks for Opendir.pir instead of Opendir.pm ?
>> Any clue ?
>
> Short answer: Rakudo has regressed and doesn't support loading .pm
> modules at the moment. You're probably on the Amsterdam (February)
> release. I
Author: masak
Date: 2010-03-03 15:16:22 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 29930
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] typo, discovered by particle++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
--- docs/Pe
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Ronald Schmidt
wrote:
>
> Please try removing the parrot and parrot_install directories and try
> the --gen-parrot option again and let me know if that changes the
> failure mode.
>
>
>
> No luck.
>
> I removed both directories, reset the build\PARROT_VERSION to 44
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-03-03 18:34:04 +0100 (Wed, 03 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 29931
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] remove 1/2 and +2-3i literal forms, now rely on angle dwimmery for
literals,
or constant folding otherwise.
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
==
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] remove 1/2 and +2-3i literal forms, now rely on angle dwimmery for
literals,
or constant folding otherwise.
I find this an interesting change, and I can see how it would simplify some
things, even thoug
Doesn't unspace work for this?
On Wednesday, March 3, 2010, Darren Duncan wrote:
> pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
>
> Modified:
> docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
> Log:
> [S02] remove 1/2 and +2-3i literal forms, now rely on angle dwimmery for
> literals,
> or constant folding otherwise.
>
Mark J. Reed wrote:
Doesn't unspace work for this?
It would seem that S02 says otherwise:
Although we say that the unspace hides the whitespace from the parser, it
does not hide whitespace from the lexer. As a result, unspace is not allowed
within a token.
So, assuming that an integer
Surely this is not a common-enough requirement to warrant a special
syntax.
At 80-columns, you can represent integers up to ninety-nine
quinvigintillion, nine hundred ninety-nine quattuorvigintillion, nine
hundred ninety-nine trevigintillion, nine hundred ninety-nine
duovigintillion, nine hundred
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Darren Duncan wrote:
> Mark J. Reed wrote:
>>
>> Doesn't unspace work for this?
>
> It would seem that S02 says otherwise:
>
> Although we say that the unspace hides the whitespace from the parser, it
> does not hide whitespace from the lexer. As a result, unspa
Damian Conway wrote:
Surely this is not a common-enough requirement to warrant a special
syntax.
At 80-columns, you can represent integers up to
Surely that's enough for the vast majority of users, isn't it?
Well, 80 columns was an example, albeit the most common, but the principle idea
wa
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:39:58PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
: Damian Conway wrote:
: >Surely this is not a common-enough requirement to warrant a special
: >syntax.
: >
: >At 80-columns, you can represent integers up to
:
: >Surely that's enough for the vast majority of users, isn't it?
:
: We
22 matches
Mail list logo
