Re: Synopsis 02: Range objects

2009-08-31 Thread TSa
HaloO, Jon Lang wrote: '<' and '<=' numify their arguments before comparing them. 'lt' and 'le' stringify their arguments before comparing them. 'before' compares its arguments without any coercion. Note that there's no equivalent to '<='. This last one is !after and !before is '>='. Regards

Re: Synopsis 02: Range objects

2009-08-31 Thread Jon Lang
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:42 AM, TSa wrote: > > HaloO, > > Jon Lang wrote: >> >> '<' and '<=' numify their arguments before comparing them. >> 'lt' and 'le' stringify their arguments before comparing them. >> 'before' compares its arguments without any coercion.  Note that >> there's no equivalen

Parrot Bug Summary

2009-08-31 Thread Parrot Bug Summary
Parrot Bug Summary http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html Generated at Mon Aug 31 13:00:01 2009 GMT --- * Numbers * New Issues * Overview of Open Issues * Ticket Status By Version * Requestors with m

[perl #68872] [PATCH] Implement div operator to create Rats

2009-08-31 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Solomon Foster # Please include the string: [perl #68872] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68872 > Quick implementation of div operator. This will make the S03-operators/basic-types.t

[perl #68876] issues with 3.. and ..3 in regular expression...

2009-08-31 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by equinox # Please include the string: [perl #68876] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68876 > Hi, I found the range contructs do not work properly in rakudo at all times. Example: /a **

[perl #68884] [BUG] Undeclared A::B::foo things are treated as a call to Undef, should be a call to undefined &foo in A::B in Rakudo

2009-08-31 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #68884] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68884 > rakudo: module A::B; A::B::foo rakudo 0d4fe0: OUTPUT«invoke() not implemented in class

[perl #68882] [BUG] Null PMC access after calling a sub where the last statement is undefine()

2009-08-31 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Carlin Bingham # Please include the string: [perl #68882] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68882 > Also occurs with methods etc. > sub foo { my $a = "baz"; undefine $a; }; say foo; Nul

[perl #68880] [PATCH] Add two files to spectest

2009-08-31 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Solomon Foster # Please include the string: [perl #68880] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68880 > -- Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com 0

Re: [perl #68876] issues with 3.. and ..3 in regular expression...

2009-08-31 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 02:26:00AM -0700, equinox wrote: > > I found the range contructs do not work properly in rakudo at all times. > > Example: /a ** ..3/ and /a ** 3../ Omitting values from either side of ".." doesn't make a valid range. You probably mean to have /a ** 0..3/ and /a ** 3..

[perl #68894] tests available

2009-08-31 Thread kyleha
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now available in t/spec/S02-builtin_data_types/whatever.t commit 3911c7a585882d8b8dc8ddc0af1d6ef6dd97dbcc Author: moritz Date: Mon Aug 31 19:48:47 2009 + [t/spec] test for RT #68894, $number % * git-svn-id:

r28146 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-08-31 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2009-08-31 21:56:55 +0200 (Mon, 31 Aug 2009) New Revision: 28146 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod Log: [S02] remove fossil noticed by pmichaud++ Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod === --- docs/Perl6/

Re: r28113 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-08-31 Thread Darren Duncan
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: Author: lwall Date: 2009-08-29 21:06:40 +0200 (Sat, 29 Aug 2009) New Revision: 28113 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod Log: [S03] some tidying of /, %, div, and mod @@ -699,7 +699,16 @@ $numerator / $denominator -If either operand is

Re: r28113 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-08-31 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:28:08PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote: > This is a great move; thanks for this change. > > So now writing things like 5/43 in code will DWIM and produce a Rat which > maintains the intended value exactly, with no floating-point imprecision; > and so plain 5/43 is now a pla

[perl #68894] 3 % * dies with Ambiguous Dispatch

2009-08-31 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz # Please include the string: [perl #68894] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68894 > rakudo 4fc254: $ perl6 -e '3 % *' Ambiguous dispatch to multi 'infix:%'. Ambiguous candid

Re: r28113 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-08-31 Thread Darren Duncan
Patrick R. Michaud wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:28:08PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote: This is a great move; thanks for this change. So now writing things like 5/43 in code will DWIM and produce a Rat which maintains the intended value exactly, with no floating-point imprecision; and so pla

[perl #68892] [PATCH] Minor Rat improvements

2009-08-31 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Solomon Foster # Please include the string: [perl #68892] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68892 > -- Solomon Foster: colo...@gmail.com HarmonyWare, Inc: http://www.harmonyware.com 0

Re: [perl #68876] issues with 3.. and ..3 in regular expression...

2009-08-31 Thread anteusz
Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 02:26:00AM -0700, equinox wrote: I found the range contructs do not work properly in rakudo at all times. Example: /a ** ..3/ and /a ** 3../ Omitting values from either side of ".." doesn't make a valid range. You probably mea

Re: [perl #68876] issues with 3.. and ..3 in regular expression...

2009-08-31 Thread Jonathan Scott Duff
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:26 AM, equinox wrote: > # New Ticket Created by equinox > # Please include the string: [perl #68876] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68876 > > > > Hi, > > I found the range contruct

r28150 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-08-31 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2009-09-01 01:42:06 +0200 (Tue, 01 Sep 2009) New Revision: 28150 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod Log: [S03] steal ::= for readonly binding ala sigs Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod === -

r28151 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-08-31 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2009-09-01 02:09:52 +0200 (Tue, 01 Sep 2009) New Revision: 28151 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod Log: [S02,S06] make 'is context' implicit on $*foo variable declarations orthogonalize readonly semantics to rely on ::= initialization