Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon May 25 13:00:01 2009 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with m
HaloO,
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
I'm assuming that the container defines what item assignment means. At
the very least, it will have the STORE method. But I want to have
infix:<=> definable in general without having to make it masquerade as
an Item Container.
I strongly agree with that. It sh
Can you tell me if I'm missing something fundamental here?
Regarding "item containers" ...
my @A = (1, 2, 3);
my $x; # default to "is Scalar"
$x = @A;
Now $x is BOUND TO an item container of type Scalar, which CONTAINS an
Array which itself CONTAINS 3 items of type Int.
@A is BOUND
HaloO,
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
Now back to straightening out my misconceptions about scalars _always_
holding item containers. If $x is bound to an Array, for example, the
compiled code can't be doing the indirection innately.
So it follows that the method forwarding is a property of the obje
Em Seg, 2009-05-25 às 11:36 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu:
> Can you tell me if I'm missing something fundamental here?
While I'm not larry, I think I can help you out here ;)
> Regarding "item containers" ...
> my @A = (1, 2, 3);
> my $x; # default to "is Scalar"
> $x = @A;
'$x'
That's an enjoyable and educational read, thanks!
There's one form under TMTOWTDI that I'd like to see, but can't figure
out myself. It's the version analogous to this perl5 snippet-
sub odd {$_ % 2}
say grep odd,0..6;
-where the line that filters the list mentions no variables at all,
and "
Author: moritz
Date: 2009-05-25 21:49:59 +0200 (Mon, 25 May 2009)
New Revision: 26933
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] maybe a newline after the BOM unconfuses the POD parser?
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
Hello,
I really like POD and I like the changes in the upcoming Perl 6 Pod.
Have you ever heard of literate programing? (see Wikipedia). I think it
would be neat if Pod could do literate programing. It is already very
close. For reference, please see this article:
For reference, please see
Daniel (>):
> [...]
>
> In this way, a relatively simple change makes Perl 6 Pod able to do literate
> programing for anyone who is interested.
>
> What do you think?
That it sounds like a good idea for a sublanguage-extending module.
// Carl
Carl Mäsak wrote:
In this way, a relatively simple change makes Perl 6 Pod able to do literate
programing for anyone who is interested.
What do you think?
That it sounds like a good idea for a sublanguage-extending module.
I'm not familiar with those. Are they hard to make? I guess that it i
Daniel Ruoso daniel-at-ruoso.com |Perl 6| wrote:
A few facts:
* A Scalar in item context returns its value;
* The dotty operator implies item context;
* A list in item context returns itself;
Thanks.
Exactly. but it would probably be more clear to state that "the name
'$x' in the lexpad
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Carrera
wrote:
> In this way, a relatively simple change makes Perl 6 Pod able to do literate
> programing for anyone who is interested.
>
> What do you think?
The main literate programming feature that's missing from POD is the
ability to scramble the orde
I think the equivalent of tangle/weave would take docs designed for
literate reading and produce the runable file. Perl doesn't have to
execute it directly. But that can be automated using a source filter.
Daniel Carrera daniel.carrera-at-theingots.org |Perl 6| wrote:
Hello,
I really like P
On Sat, 2 May 2009, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi. Can someone (Dave Rolsky?) please tell me why rewriting
S32/Temporal in terms of Enum roles would be bad? See the example of Enum
day roles here:
http://www.rakudo.org/node/39
Because day and month names are hardly universal, and forcing p
Author: jdlugosz
Date: 2009-05-26 01:55:20 +0200 (Tue, 26 May 2009)
New Revision: 26937
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[s04] put in C<...> tags, fix some <...> that have the C missing, typos,
true=>True, etc. Improve one turn-of-the-phrase as discussed with Larry in
July.
Mo
On Mon, 25 May 2009, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2009, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi. Can someone (Dave Rolsky?) please tell me why rewriting
S32/Temporal in terms of Enum roles would be bad? See the example of Enum
day roles here:
http://www.rakudo.org/node/39
Because day and month
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Carl Mäsak wrote:
In this way, a relatively simple change makes Perl 6 Pod able to do
literate
programing for anyone who is interested.
What do you think?
That it sounds like a good idea for a sublanguage-extending module.
I'm not familiar with t
Author: jdlugosz
Date: 2009-05-26 02:14:51 +0200 (Tue, 26 May 2009)
New Revision: 26938
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] update code under "do-once loop" in line with current specs.
Move a paragraph that was interfering with the antecedent of the following
paragraph.
Modif
18 matches
Mail list logo
