Author: finanalyst
Date: 2009-03-08 09:43:16 +0100 (Sun, 08 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25745
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
Added descriptions to standard rules, regrouped rules, added new rule to
enable definition of .
Eliminated deprecated .
Changed deprecated to and deprecated
Various Appocalypses, Exegeses, and Synopses use rules in example codes.
These were gathered together by PM and implemented in PGE. Larry asked
for them to be listed in S05 & for a short description to be added.
Timothy Nelson added them and I have just described them.
This yielded some extra
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #63698]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63698 >
---
src/builtins/any-list.pir | 61 -
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #63700]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63700 >
Hello.
std: my $c = &infix:; say &$c(5, 42);
std 25744: OUTPUT«ok 00:03 48m»
r
# New Ticket Created by Cory Spencer
# Please include the string: [perl #63702]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63702 >
This patch adds a Perl 6 version of map to the setting.
0001-Squashed-commit-of-the-
# New Ticket Created by Cory Spencer
# Please include the string: [perl #63704]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63704 >
This patch adds a Perl 6 version of the pairs method to the setting.
0001-Replace-PI
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #63708]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63708 >
rakudo: &f
rakudo ed4cd1: RESULT«Null PMC access in find_method() [...]
* masak submit
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #63712]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63712 >
---
src/builtins/any-list.pir | 47 -
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #63716]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63716 >
---
src/classes/Range.pir | 12
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #63710]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63710 >
rakudo: <>
rakudo ed4cd1: RESULT«[]»
rakudo:
rakudo ed4cd1: RESULT«"STDIN"»
those
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #63706]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63706 >
rakudo: for any(1,2) -> $x {}
rakudo ed4cd1: OUTPUT«No exception handler and no messag
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #63714]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63714 >
Result of autounfuge :)
$ perl tools/autounfudge.pl --unskip --debug t/spec/S29-li
(OK, the subject sucked, but I tried :)
From S14:
You can, however, say
$fido does Sentry;
$fido does Tricks;
$fido does TailChasing;
$fido does Scratch;
Unlike the compile-time role composition, each of these layers
on a new mixin with a new level of inheritance
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:28:29PM -0800, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
>
> std: my $c = &infix:; say &$c(5, 42);
> std 25744: OUTPUT«ok 00:03 48m»
> rakudo: my $c = &infix:; say &$c(5, 42);
> rakudo ed4cd1: OUTPUT«Statement not terminated properly at line
> 1, near ":; sa"current instr.: 'parro
+our List multi method pairs(@values: *...@indices) {
+gather {
+for (@values.keys Z @values) -> $key, $val is rw {
+take ($key => $val)
+unless (@indices && ($key !~~ any(@indices)));
+}
+}
+}
Especially in class
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 09:50:02PM -0800, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> +our List multi min(*...@values) {
> +my $by = @values[0] ~~ Code ?? shift @values !! sub { $^a cmp $^b };
> +@values.min($by);
> +}
This doesn't match the spec -- the $by parameter is required.
At any rate, the first argu
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #63724]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63724 >
For someone looking for something to do -- the recent change to
evaluating List ob
Author: moritz
Date: 2009-03-08 19:52:09 +0100 (Sun, 08 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25750
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] remove nonsensical return value from min/max
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
==
Author: moritz
Date: 2009-03-08 20:00:07 +0100 (Sun, 08 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25751
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] forgot to bump version number; fixed date from the future
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
=
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 09:50:02PM -0800, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
>> +our List multi min(*...@values) {
>> +my $by = @values[0] ~~ Code ?? shift @values !! sub { $^a cmp $^b };
>> +@values.min($by);
>> +}
>
> This doesn't match the spec -- the $by parameter is r
Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
> +our List multi method pairs(@values: *...@indices) {
> +gather {
> +for (@values.keys Z @values) -> $key, $val is rw {
> +take ($key => $val)
> +unless (@indices && ($key !~~ any(@indices)));
> +
Currently the spec says:
C returns a lazily evaluated list which is comprised of
the return value of the expression, evaluated once for every
one of the C<@values> that are passed in.
But both pugs and rakudo respect the arity of the code ref passed to it,
so that (1..6).map({$^a + $^b + $^c})
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 08:15:32PM +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> I hope I fixed both of your concerns with this commit:
> commit 051ad5115268e5415bebb1988cbf0b1be626156b
Yes, they look much better now. Thanks!
Pm
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:36:17PM +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote:
: Currently the spec says:
:
: C returns a lazily evaluated list which is comprised of
: the return value of the expression, evaluated once for every
: one of the C<@values> that are passed in.
:
: But both pugs and rakudo respect th
24 matches
Mail list logo
