[perl #61824] ++ makes variables rw, <-> seemingly doesn't

2009-02-10 Thread Vasily Chekalkin via RT
On Mon Dec 29 10:17:11 2008, masak wrote: > rakudo: my @a = <1 2 3 4 5 6>; my @b = (10..16); for @a Z @b > <-> $a,$b { $a++ }; say @a; > rakudo 34586: OUTPUT«234567␤» > rakudo: my @a = <1 2 3 4 5 6>; my @b = (10..16); for @a Z @b > <-> $a,$b { $a = $a +1 }; say @a; > rakudo 34586: OUTPUT«Canno

[perl #63136] Printing to $*OUT and $*DEFOUT doesn't work in Rakudo

2009-02-10 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #63136] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63136 > rakudo: $*OUT.say: "OH HAI" rakudo 577566: OUTPUT«Cannot write to a filehandle not ope

r25269 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-10 Thread pugs-commits
Author: hinrik Date: 2009-02-10 15:54:04 +0100 (Tue, 10 Feb 2009) New Revision: 25269 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod Log: [S05] fix Pod error due to misplaced =back Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod === --- docs/Per

Re: [perl #43715] [TODO] C should really be L (lib/Parrot/Docs/POD2HTML.pm)

2009-02-10 Thread Will Coleda
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Christoph Otto via RT wrote: > On Sun Feb 08 12:09:30 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote: >> On Tue Jul 10 05:15:33 2007, pcoch wrote: >> > In the file lib/Parrot/Docs/POD2HTML.pm there is the todo item: >> > >> > # TODO - C should really be L >> > # but

r25270 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-02-10 Thread pugs-commits
Author: hinrik Date: 2009-02-10 16:01:32 +0100 (Tue, 10 Feb 2009) New Revision: 25270 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod Log: [S29] fix Pod error due to missing =back Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod === --- do

[perl #63126] Junctions in array and hash indices don't work in Rakudo

2009-02-10 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #63126] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63126 > rakudo: my @a = "foo", "foot"; if @a[all(0,1)] ~~ /^ foo/ { say "OH MY!" } rakudo 5775

[perl #63146] [TODO] Implement (*) in the LHS of 'my' declarations

2009-02-10 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #63146] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63146 > my (*) = 5 should work though iirc rakudo: my (*) = 5; rakudo 577566: OUTPUT«Could n

Re: [perl #63146] [TODO] Implement (*) in the LHS of 'my' declarations

2009-02-10 Thread Larry Wall
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:14:35PM -0800, Carl Mäsak wrote: : # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" : # Please include the string: [perl #63146] : # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. : # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63146 > : : : my (*) = 5 sh

{*} and actions

2009-02-10 Thread Chris Dolan
1) Will the "{*}" syntax to invoke an external action method from within a grammar be an official part of the language, or an implementation hack? 2) If it becomes official, how should people specify the action class/ instance to be used with a grammar? Currently in Rakudo, I use the follo