# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #62892]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62892 >
rakudo: role A {}; class B is A {}
rakudo 36139: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_string(
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #62894]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62894 >
so protoobjects are defined?
rakudo: class A {}; my A $a; say $a.defined
rakudo 36139
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #62898]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62898 >
In Rakudo r36143, the following works:
$ perl6 -e 'role A::B {}; class A {}' # works
B
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #62900]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62900 >
rakudo: role A::B {}; say 42 ~~ A
rakudo 36143: OUTPUT«invoke() not implemented in cla
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #62902]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62902 >
A protoobject in a normal lexical variable:
rakudo: class A {}; my A $a; say $a === A
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #62908]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62908 >
$ cat A.pm
use v6;
use B;
class A does C {
}
$ cat B.pm
use v6;
use C;
$ cat C.pm
use v
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:58:18PM -0800, Mark Lentczner wrote:
>> [STD, S03] slaughter of the LTM metatokens
>
> This cleans up the metaop scene quite a bit. Bravo!
>
> I went through STD.pm with a fine tooth comb again, to extract what I'd
> say about which operators were allowed to be meta'd b
Author: fperrad
Date: Thu Jan 29 09:34:12 2009
New Revision: 36148
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Added:
trunk/t/codingstd/make_code_coda.t (contents, props changed)
Log:
[codingstd] add check of Makefile coda
Modified: trunk/
On Thu Jan 29 02:16:23 2009, jonat...@jnthn.net wrote:
> .sub 'main'
> $S0 = 'foo'
> example('foo'=>42) # works
> # example($S0=>42) # what I want to work also
> .end
>
> .sub 'example'
> .param pmc foo :named('foo')
> say foo
> .end
>
> Uncomment the line I commented out, and
Mark (>), Moritz (>>), Larry via commit bot (>>>):
>>> +PERL# Lexical symbols in the standard "perlude"
>>
>> Did you mean "prelude" instead?
>
> I took the quotation marks to indicate an intentional
> misspelling/coinage: "perl" + "prelude" = "perlude".
At which point one might ask o
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #62920]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62920 >
After running svn up to 36161, and a make realclean, on Mandriva, the
gen::makefiles ste
masak (>):
> rakudo: role A::B {}; say 42 ~~ A
> rakudo 36143: OUTPUT«invoke() not implemented in class
> 'NameSpace [...]
> * masak submits rakudobug
> rakudo: role A::B {}; A
> rakudo 36143: OUTPUT«invoke() not implemented in class
> 'NameSpace' [...]
Related:
rakudo: class A::B {}; my A $
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
In the abstract, Perl is written in Unicode, and has consistent Unicode
-semantics regardless of the underlying text representations.
+semantics regardless of the underlying text representations. By default
+Perl presents Unicode in "NFG" formation, where ea
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
> pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
>>
>> By default Perl presents Unicode in "NFG" formation, where each grapheme
>> counts as
>> one character. A grapheme is what the novice user would think of as a
>> character in their normal everyday
masak (>):
> $ cat A.pm
> use v6;
> use B;
>
> class A does C {
> }
> $ cat B.pm
> use v6;
> use C;
> $ cat C.pm
> use v6;
>
> role C {
> }
> $ perl6 A.pm # works
>
> I've encountered cases where this fails during PIR compilation, but I
> am unable to reproduce them right now. AFAIU, it should f
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:49:13AM +0100, Carl Mäsak wrote:
: Mark (>), Moritz (>>), Larry via commit bot (>>>):
: >>> +PERL# Lexical symbols in the standard "perlude"
: >>
: >> Did you mean "prelude" instead?
: >
: > I took the quotation marks to indicate an intentional
: > misspelling
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Larry Wall wrote:
> We want something that comes
> outside your program, that is, a lexical scope that *surrounds* the
> file scope. We don't have a good word for that: circumlude? ambilude?
>[...]
> Or we could go with a more linguistic contextual metaphor. A
Larry Wall wrote:
> So I'm open to suggestions for what we ought to call that envelope
> if we don't call it the prelude or the perlude. Locale is bad,
> environs is bad, context is bad...the wrapper? But we have dynamic
> wrappers already, so that's bad. Maybe the setting, like a jewel?
> That
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:30:25AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> So anyway, just because other languages call it a prelude doesn't
> mean that we have to. Perl is the tail that's always trying to
> wag the dog...
>
> What is the sound of one tail wagging?
For my dog Sally, the sound of one tail wag
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:30:02AM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
> pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
>> In the abstract, Perl is written in Unicode, and has consistent Unicode
>> -semantics regardless of the underlying text representations.
>> +semantics regardless of the underlying text represen
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 08:12 +0100, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
> @@ -103,7 +106,7 @@
> =item *
>
> POD sections may be used reliably as multiline comments in Perl 6.
> -Unlike in Perl 5, POD syntax now requires that C<=begin comment>
> +Unlike in Perl 5, POD syntax now lets you use C<=
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:28:43AM -0800, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
: On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 08:12 +0100, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
: > @@ -103,7 +106,7 @@
: > =item *
: >
: > POD sections may be used reliably as multiline comments in Perl 6.
: > -Unlike in Perl 5, POD syntax now requ
Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:30:02AM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
What's with this NFG / Normal Form G that you refer to? I don't see any
mention of that in http://unicode.org/reports/tr15/ ... did you mean NFC?
Nope, this is a Perl/Parrot idea. It started out with a notion of
23 matches
Mail list logo
