Daniel (>), Carl (>>):
>> The above reasoning raises the following question for me: how do I
>> return from a sub or a method from within a map block?
>
> I suppose what you want can be achieved with "last", it probably should
> work in "map" as well, since "map" and "for" are synonims...
That is
Em Seg, 2008-12-08 às 12:08 +0100, Carl Mäsak escreveu:
> Daniel (>), Carl (>>):
> That is all good and well for exiting the map itself; but what I want
> to achieve is to exit the surrounding sub or method block. Example:
Er... I mean actually the opposite... it should always return from the
surr
Em Dom, 2008-12-07 às 18:10 +0100, Carl Mäsak escreveu:
> The above reasoning raises the following question for me: how do I
> return from a sub or a method from within a map block?
I suppose what you want can be achieved with "last", it probably should
work in "map" as well, since "map" and "for"
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Dec 8 14:00:01 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with mo
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #61136]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61136 >
Hello.
Simple example
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/xquery$ cat m.pl
token a { 'a' };
to
On Sun Dec 07 07:24:07 2008, masak wrote:
> The .subst method in Rakudo r33599 can understand :x()...
>
> $ perl6 -e 'say "foo1foo2foo3foo4".subst("foo", "bar", :x(2))' # yes
> bar1bar2foo3foo4
>
> ...and :nth()...
>
> $ perl6 -e 'say "foo1foo2foo3foo4".subst("foo", "bar", :nth(2))' # yes
> foo1
ChrisDolan has left a new comment on your post "Episode 3: Squaak
Details and First Steps":
srottak: I'll bet that #57864: Calling a token "text", "null" or "ws"
in Rakudo makes matching fail is the cause.
Posted by ChrisDolan to Parrot at December 7, 2008 9:10 PM
Windows 2000 SP4
Visual Studio 2003 SP1
The hardware is:
Pentium MMX (586) with 128mb ram.
The problem with the test file is that it does not work reliably for the
processors that do not support the fcomip cpu instruction (586 and earlier).
I tried to fix this myself by using
CPUID, but I don't
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 03:09:30PM -0800, Moritz Lenz via RT wrote:
> > ...but not :x() together with :nth()...
> >
> > $ perl6 -e 'say "foo1foo2foo3foo4".subst("foo", "bar", :x(2),
> > :nth(2))' # expected foo1bar2foo3bar4
> > foo1bar2foo3foo4
> >
> > The above are my personal expectations. The
# New Ticket Created by Ben Marsh
# Please include the string: [perl #61154]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61154 >
The test in t/src/compiler.t is being skipped with comment 'compreg
disabled/imcc_compile_p
kjs has left a new comment on your post "Episode 3: Squaak Details and
First Steps":
srottak: You should check the action method definitions in the
action.pm file. Please note that each {*} indicates an invocation to an
action method that has the same name as the rule in which the {*}
occurs. Plea
Daniel (>), Carl (>>):
>> That is all good and well for exiting the map itself; but what I want
>> to achieve is to exit the surrounding sub or method block. Example:
>
> Er... I mean actually the opposite... it should always return from the
> surrounding sub or method, never only from "map", if yo
* Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-07 14:20]:
> So why are you all so hessitating in making each other's life
> easier? There is no 100% solution, but 0% is even worse!
It looks like Python 3000 just tried that.
People are not happy about it:
http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/pyth
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like Python 3000 just tried that.
>
> People are not happy about it:
> http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/python/OsListdirProblem
>
Yeeh, I also noted exactly that problem when reading the "What's New
In
* Aristotle Pagaltzis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081208 19:16]:
> * Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-07 14:20]:
> > So why are you all so hessitating in making each other's life
> > easier? There is no 100% solution, but 0% is even worse!
>
> It looks like Python 3000 just tried that.
> People
A very interesting question came up on #perl today, so I'm
forwarding it to p6l for discussion/decision.
Given the following code:
sub foo() { return 1; }
sub bar() { warn "oops"; }
{
CONTROL { ... }
foo();
bar();
}
S04 seems to clearly indicate that
Author: allison
Date: Mon Dec 8 19:45:45 2008
New Revision: 33688
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd15_objects.pod
Log:
[pdd] Caught documented name inconsistent with implemented name.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd15_objects.pod
===
Author: allison
Date: Mon Dec 8 21:16:33 2008
New Revision: 33695
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Added:
trunk/src/io/core.c
- copied unchanged from r33691, /branches/pdd22io_part2/src/io/core.c
trunk/src/io/socket_api.c
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
