> Currently, IMCC still has a 2-digit limit for PASM registers.
> I think we can easily extend this to any number, as long as it fits in
> an INTVAL.
Last time I checked, register allocator and some other imcc parts used
unsigned char for register numbers in several places.
--
Salu2
# New Ticket Created by Chris Dolan
# Please include the string: [perl #60946]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60946 >
I'm trying to make mock objects in Rakudo, but the 'isa' opcode in
PIR seems to ignore
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Dec 1 14:00:01 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with mo
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu Jun 26 20:16:45 2008, coke wrote:
>> On Mon Dec 10 11:49:08 2007, pmichaud wrote:
>> >
>> > When an NQP program uses a variable that hasn't been
>> > previously declared, it should report a useful error messag
Just a note that I expect we will fix this when we implement
slicing and the postcircumfix: methods.
Pm
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 06:23:31AM -0800, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT wrote:
> On Sat Sep 08 10:39:31 2007, bernhard wrote:
> > Just for the records, Andy Lester wrote on p2:
> >
> > bignum.c seems to be entirely unused. Everything builds just fine
> > without it. There are many lint errors in it, suc
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:01:24AM -0800, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT wrote:
> On Tue Oct 02 10:49:05 2007, pcoch wrote:
> > In src/objects.c:parrot_class_register() there is the todo item:
> >
> > /* XXX nested, use current as base ? */
> >
> > Which is referring to namespaces. Make a decision about
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:07:20AM -0800, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT wrote:
> On Sat Oct 06 03:15:12 2007, pcoch wrote:
> > In compilers/imcc/main.c:do_pre_process() there is the todo item:
> >
> > /* TODO: print out more information about the macro */
>
> Is having more information about a macro, in
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:09:38AM -0800, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT wrote:
> On Sun Nov 30 05:51:34 2008, kjs wrote:
> > On Thu Nov 29 11:35:12 2007, pmichaud wrote:
> > > In the list of "Standard Parrot Exceptions" in pdd23, there's
> > > no item given for "exception;death" even though it's mentioned
# New Ticket Created by Ruslan
# Please include the string: [perl #60966]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60966 >
In this code, result will be 123, but i think that it must be 1.
sub test(@test is copy)
{
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #60962]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60962 >
Rakudo as of r33417 fails t/spec/S12-methods/default-trait.t and
t/spec/S12-methods
# New Ticket Created by Ruslan
# Please include the string: [perl #60964]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60964 >
On winXp(SP3) on this test i have racudo hungup:
Hello,
I'm wondering how to write anonymous value literals of some Perl 6 basic types,
and I didn't see mention of this in synopsis 2.
Now, with some basic types, I know how to do it, examples:
Bool # Bool::True
Int # 42 or 0x17 or :12
Rat|Num # 18.2 or :8<53.07> or 4/3
Str
I'm sorry, that is:
sub test(@test is copy, $as)
{
@test[0] = 123;
};
my @test = (1, 2, 3, 4);
test(@test);
print @test[0];
After that perl6.exe will produce:
too few arguments passed (1) - 2 params expected
current instr.: 'test' pc 162 (EVAL_13:64)
called from Sub '_block11' pc 85 (EVA
# New Ticket Created by "gabriele renzi"
# Please include the string: [perl #60976]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60976 >
The bug is visibile with the following line
subset GenderStr of Str where /^[m|f]$/
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dave Whipp wrote:
> Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> > Still misunderstanding, I think. Yes, it will fail anyway, but in the
> > general case you're checking to see if as a privileged process it is safe to
> > operate on a given file.
>
> I'd actually been thinking that one w
Darren (>):
> Bit
> Blob
> Set
> Bag
> Mapping
>
> How does one write anonymous value literals of those types? And I mean
> directly, not by writing a literal of some other type and using a conversion
> function to derive the above?
Why is the latter method insufficient for your needs?
// C
* Martin D Kealey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081202 04:37]:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dave Whipp wrote:
>
> sub setstat(String|File $filename, StatBuf $stat) {
> ...
> if $caps.CAP_FOWNER {
> # we're privileged, so it *should* just work.
> POSIX::chown $filename, $stat.uid, $stat.gid;
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
