# New Ticket Created by Bruce Stockwell
# Please include the string: [perl #60546]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60546 >
This is rewrite of t/oo/proxy.t to PIR
proxy.t | 89 -
# New Ticket Created by Bruce Stockwell
# Please include the string: [perl #60550]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60550 >
This is a rewrite of t/oo/methods.t to PIR
methods.t | 120
+++
Dave has left a new comment on your post "Register allocation in a PIR
compiler":
Never mind. Something about this was nagging me, so I went back and
read it again, and it looks like you are not spilling registers at all,
but just reusing dead registers. So my comment doesn't apply.
That's the pr
On Fri Nov 14 11:42:02 2008, bernhard wrote:
> On Mo. 16. Jun. 2008, 16:50:13, coke wrote:
> > On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, it is
> > apparent
> > > that there's enough bit rot in tools/util/smokeserv-server.pl
chromatic wrote:
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:07:18 James Keenan via RT wrote:
Still failing as of r32225; cf
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/7437/260
not ok 6 - set_integer_keyed_str
# Failed test 'set_integer_keyed_str'
# at t/pmc/packfile.t line 140.
# Exit
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:28 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri Nov 14 11:42:02 2008, bernhard wrote:
>> On Mo. 16. Jun. 2008, 16:50:13, coke wrote:
>> > On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > > While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, i
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To my way of thinking, deprecation is for parrot features, not
> developer tools, so I don't think we need to follow the same rules
> here. (But if I'm overruled, we need to decide before the release this
> Tuesday.)
>
> I w
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:31 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> chromatic wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:07:18 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>>> Still failing as of r32225; cf
>>> http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/7437/260
>>>
>>> not ok 6 - set_i
On Sat Nov 08 00:06:50 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Can you post a backtrace?
>
Attached.
backtrace.packfile_6.pir
Description: Binary data
Klaas-Jan Stol via RT schrieb:
I think this has been resolved, but not sure.
Can anyone confirm?
It looks like it is not resolved yet.
In src/ops/math.ops I still found:
n_infix, n_abs and n_neg.
Regards,
Bernhard
[oops, forgot to copy the list.]
If darwin has gdb, you can do the following to get a backtrace:
$ gdb parrot
gdb> run t/pmc/packfile_6.pir
[segfault should occur here]
gdb> bt
Mark
Author: kjs
Date: Sat Nov 15 14:51:49 2008
New Revision: 32677
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[pdd19] fix a pod error.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
==
--- trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod (
Author: kjs
Date: Sat Nov 15 15:17:37 2008
New Revision: 32679
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[pdd19] update .arg and .result into new forms (.set_arg, etc.)
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
==
--
Will Coleda wrote:
Is the smoke server still used?
Can support for the smoke server be dropped?
+1 from me; I vote for smolder.
+1, on not maintaining two independent solutions for the same problem.
Allison
14 matches
Mail list logo
