Re: YAPC::EU 2008

Jonathan Worthington wrote: Patrick and I will be hacking on the 12th and the 16th. If you've not seen Copenhagen before, I could forgive you for wanting to spend a day enjoying the city rather than hacking though - it's nice! :-) I have, in fact, seen Copenhagen before, and if it weren't fo

[perl #56800] [META] merge pdd25cx branch back into trunk

On Tue Jul 22 06:10:41 2008, fperrad wrote: > > In fact 'docall' uses a pushaction. I modified 'docall' so it no longer uses pushaction, and all Lua tests are now passing.

[perl #57522] [PATCH] verbose test harness flag

# New Ticket Created by "jason switzer" # Please include the string: [perl #57522] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57522 > The test harness used the default verbosity mode provided by TAP::Harness. It seemed

[perl #56800] [META] merge pdd25cx branch back into trunk

chromatic and I have fixed the majority of the language issues (see child tickets for specific comments). I will merge the branch back into trunk first thing tomorrow morning (Saturday, August 2nd).

[perl #56786] [pdd25cx] Segfault with tcl

In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it keeps complaining about calls to tcl_error_s which it says doesn't exist. Since you mentioned you were eliminating the versions of tcl_error identical to 'die', I went through and replaced the calls to tcl_error with calls to die. It builds

[perl #57504] [PATCH][Lua] Fixed 64bit bug in Lua bytecode decoder/translator.

# New Ticket Created by Robert G. Jakabosky # Please include the string: [perl #57504] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57504 > Hello everyone, This is my first patch to the parrot project. This patch

[perl #38392] [BUG] FreeBSD bugs with JIT on t/op/trans.t

On Sat Jun 14 17:17:03 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can anyone on FreeBSD give us an update on this issue? freebsd7, recent parrot svn (r29922) passes the t/op/trans.t tests Determining JIT capability.yes It even works with freebsd's make, not only

Re: [perl #39742] [BUG] installed parrot conflicts with dev parrot.

Andy Dougherty schrieb: On Sat, 14 Jun 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote: Can we get an update as to the issues raised in this ticket? The general issue "installeld parrot conflicts with dev parrot" -- at least when a shared libparrot.so is used is, as far as I know, unsolved. A l

Re: [perl #57504] [PATCH][Lua] Fixed 64bit bug in Lua bytecode decoder/translator.

- Original Message - From: "Robert G. Jakabosky (via RT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [perl #57504] [PATCH][Lua] Fixed 64bit bug in Lua bytecode decoder/translator. Changes to 'languages/lua/t/os.t': 1 test from 'os.t' fails on 64bit systems because 'os.time()' does not return a 'ni

[perl #57522] [PATCH] verbose test harness flag

I have tried this patch out in a sandbox from trunk and, at the very least, it does no harm with anything up through Parrot's 'make test'. I rarely go into the languages or, for example, run Rakudo's 'make test', so I'm unclear as to how to use this. What would I do after I've called: cd languag

[perl #38392] [BUG] FreeBSD bugs with JIT on t/op/trans.t

On Sat Aug 02 05:06:31 2008, rurban wrote: > On Sat Jun 14 17:17:03 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Can anyone on FreeBSD give us an update on this issue? > > freebsd7, recent parrot svn (r29922) > passes the t/op/trans.t tests > > Thanks for looking into this, Reini. Now, would these failu

Re: [perl #56786] [pdd25cx] Segfault with tcl

On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it keeps > complaining about calls to tcl_error_s which it says doesn't exist. > Since you mentioned you were eliminating the versions of tcl_error > identical

Re: [perl #56786] [pdd25cx] Segfault with tcl

On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it keeps >> complaining about calls to tcl_error_s which it says doesn't exist. >>

Re: [perl #56786] [pdd25cx] Segfault with tcl

On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it kee

Re: [svn:parrot] r29940 - branches/pdd25cx/languages/tcl/src

On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:20 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: coke > Date: Sat Aug 2 08:20:01 2008 > New Revision: 29940 > > Modified: > branches/pdd25cx/languages/tcl/src/macros.pir > > Log: > [tcl] The error message is actually in the 'message' slot now; having the > wrong name here

Re: "returns" keyword - current meaning?

On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 01:50:42AM -0500, John M. Dlugosz wrote: > According to S02, "The word returns is allowed as an alias for of." and > "The as property specifies a constraint to be enforced on the return > value ..., is not advertised as the type of the routine" > > However, S06 states, " >

Re: "Code-only forms"?

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:56:14AM -0500, John M. Dlugosz wrote: > In S04, "Other similar Code-only forms ..." > What does that mean? It is feebly attempting to say that, because these are control flow functions, the argument is really a thunk that the function has control of when and how it's exe

Re: continuation taken?

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:25:53AM -0500, John M. Dlugosz wrote: > In S04, "Note that temporizations that are undone upon scope exit must be > prepared to be redone if a continuation within that scope is taken." > > What will create a continuation there and how do you take it? > > That is, how wil

[perl #57530] Fwd: Parallelize the Perl 6 tests

# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud # Please include the string: [perl #57530] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57530 > Schwern provided the following patch at the OSCON hackathon, but we should probabl

Re: [perl #57438] [DEPRECATED] [PDD19] .pragma n_operators

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:07:49AM +0100, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:06 PM, via RT Will Coleda wrote > > From PDD19: > > > > =item .pragma n_operators [deprecated] > > does this mean that by default all ops will have the n_ prefix by default? > That would imply some variants

Re: [perl #57530] Fwd: Parallelize the Perl 6 tests

On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Patrick R. Michaud (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud > # Please include the string: [perl #57530] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id

Re: "Code-only forms"?

On 2008 Aug 2, at 12:57, Larry Wall wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 05:56:14AM -0500, John M. Dlugosz wrote: In S04, "Other similar Code-only forms ..." What does that mean? It is feebly attempting to say that, because these are control flow functions, the argument is really a thunk that the

Re: [perl #57446] Enums of only one element don't work i rakudo

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:46:27PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote: > $ svn info | grep Revi > Revision: 29902 > > $ ./perl6 -e 'enum Weekday;' # works > $ ./perl6 -e 'enum Weekday;' # doesn't > get_pmc_keyed() not implemented in class 'Perl6Str' > [...] > > Likewise, > > $ ./perl6 -e 'enum ' # works >

Re: [perl #57450] Enum elements don't have a .perl method in rakudo

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:53:30PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote: > $ ./perl6 -e 'enum Weekday; say Monday' # works > 0 > $ ./perl6 -e 'enum Weekday; say Monday.perl' # doesn't > Method 'perl' not found for invocant of class '' > [...] > > I'm not entirely clear on what I expected to get from the .perl

Re: [perl #57448] Asking .WHAT on an enum element in rakudo causes null PMC access

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:50:32PM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote: > $ svn info | grep vi > > $ ./perl6 -e 'enum Weekday; say Tuesday.WHAT' > Null PMC access in find_method() > [...] This is likely related to RT #57450, in that it's not clear how enums should report their type or .perl representation.

Re: YAPC::EU 2008

Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote: Jonathan Worthington schrieb: Allison Randal wrote: Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote: We could always do the 12th AND the 16th, just for fun and bonus productivity (if everyone isn't exhausted from a day of hacking and three days of conference)? ;-) Patrick and I will

[svn:parrot-pdd] r29952 - in trunk: . compilers/bcg/src/pmc compilers/imcc compilers/pct/src/PAST compilers/pge/PGE config/gen/crypto config/gen/makefiles config/gen/platform/ansi config/gen/platform/

Author: allison Date: Sat Aug 2 15:45:13 2008 New Revision: 29952 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd08_keys.pod trunk/docs/pdds/pdd17_pmc.pod trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod Changes in other areas also in this revision: Added: trunk/src/pmc/exceptionhandler.pmc - copied u

Edits to submit

I've edited several of the S??.pod files,but I have not heard back from the owner ($Larry, whose name is on the top of the file) about accepting merging or rejecting my changes. I've posted the files to so they don't get lost, until someone with author

Merged pdd25cx branch

I just merged in the pdd25cx branch. Resolving all the conflicts took several hours (124 files, 1 minute or more per file...), but otherwise it went smoothly. The biggest changes you'll notice are the new exception system, a vastly reduced usage of the remaining stack (though it's not complete

Re: "Code-only forms"?

OK I think I''m getting it. You seem to have introduced the ability to use a statement rather than a block in these constructs. E.g. try blahblah; Is that in general? So the statements needs to be closure-block-like, even though braces are not written, so anything that depends on it being

[perl #57532] [BUG] config/auto/arch.pm sets incorrect value for cpuarch on 64-bit Intel OS X builds

Applied in r29959. tetragon++. Marking ticket resolved.