On Mon Jun 23 19:20:57 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Failed to 'make perl6' at r 27371: May 07.
I tried again, and 'make perl6' succeeded at r27371.
The plot thickens!
--- James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Jun 23 19:20:57 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Failed to 'make perl6' at r 27371: May 07.
>
> I tried again, and 'make perl6' succeeded at r27371.
>
> The plot thickens!
w00t! I'll try this when I get home tonight. This is great
# New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers
# Please include the string: [perl #56278]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56278 >
From: "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:33:43 -0500
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #56284]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56284 >
On Monday 23 June 2008 21:56:54 Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> Alas, the patch doesn't seem t
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #56282]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56282 >
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:33:43PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Mon, Jun
[re-sending to cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon Jun 23 13:32:47 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This was working:
> $ ./perl6 -e 'say rand(3)'
> invoke() not implemented in class 'Float'
> current instr.: '_block11' pc 41 (EVAL_13:18)
According to S29:295, the rand() function no longer takes any
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #56274]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56274 >
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 06:27:31PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> There appear
--- Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried again, and 'make perl6' succeeded at r27371.
> >
> > The plot thickens!
>
> w00t! I'll try this when I get home tonight. This is great news.
Nope. 'make test' and 'make perl6' both return the following:
../../parrot -o perl6.pbc perl6.pir
Forget everything I wrote. I missed a couple of files in my cleaning.
I got rid of them, did a 'make clean && make perl6' and now everything
is just dandy.
Thanks for the help.
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Tech blog- http://use.perl
There is another problem with :outer. It does not let you create inner
functions dynamically. For example, I couldn't use it to compile next
ECMAScript code:
function outer() {
var i = 0;
return eval("function() { return i++; }");
}
Is it not possible to have an opcode tha
--- chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nope. 'make test' and 'make perl6' both return the following:
> >
> > ../../parrot -o perl6.pbc perl6.pir
> > src/interpreter.c:1030: failed assertion
> > 'interp->op_count == core->op_count'
> > make: *** [perl6.pbc] Abort trap
> Guess: you
Ovid wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the best way of knowing which features are
> implemented. Looking through the tests in languages/perl6/t/ is a bit
> disappointing as some things I know have been implemented aren't there
> (e.g., types on sub signatures). Should I be looking elsewhere?
In
On Tue Jun 24 14:53:53 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Forget everything I wrote. I missed a couple of files in my cleaning.
> I got rid of them, did a 'make clean && make perl6' and now everything
> is just dandy.
>
Glad to hear that -- but since you are on Intel, I suspected your
results wou
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:43:34PM -0700, Mehmet Yavuz Selim Soyturk via RT
wrote:
> There is another problem with :outer. It does not let you create inner
> functions dynamically. For example, I couldn't use it to compile next
> ECMAScript code:
>
> function outer() {
> var i = 0;
>
# New Ticket Created by "Andy Bach"
# Please include the string: [perl #56304]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56304 >
running smokej from cron, all seems to build find and smoke.html gets
made/submitted but
Based on discussion earlier today in #parrotsketch, here's the detailed
specification for resolving outer subs using :lexid . If someone wants
to fold this into pdd20 somehow (on or about line 233), that would
be especially helpful.
Every Parrot subroutine that serves as a lexical outer
I'm trying to figure out the best way of knowing which features are
implemented. Looking through the tests in languages/perl6/t/ is a bit
disappointing as some things I know have been implemented aren't there
(e.g., types on sub signatures). Should I be looking elsewhere?
So for right now, I'm l
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 14:33:03 Ovid wrote:
> > Guess: you have a libparrot.so (or .dylib, or whatever Mac OS X
> > thinks looks
> > good with a black turtleneck) somewhere getting loaded before
> > blib/lib/libparrot.so.
> Bingo! Don't know how to trace that, but a quick locate confirmed an
>
And now I've got r27393 on 2007-05-08 working ... even though I
previously deemed it hanging indefinitely.
kid51, befuddled
On Tue Jun 24 05:28:42 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon Jun 23 19:20:57 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Failed to 'make perl6' at r 27371: May 07.
>
> I tried again, and 'make perl6' succeeded at r27371.
>
> The plot thickens!
'make perl6 succeeded at r27388, 2008-05-07.
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 12:13:53 Ovid wrote:
> Nope. 'make test' and 'make perl6' both return the following:
>
> ../../parrot -o perl6.pbc perl6.pir
> src/interpreter.c:1030: failed assertion
> 'interp->op_count == core->op_count'
> make: *** [perl6.pbc] Abort trap
>
> Exact same thing a
Ovid wrote:
That works just fine, so I know we have types on signatures. But now
this fails:
# remove the 'Int' and this works
sub fact (Int $n) {
if 0 == $n {
return 1;
}
else {
return $n * fact($n - 1);
}
}
say fact(5);
The failure is at runtime, not com
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:18:31PM +0100, Ovid wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the best way of knowing which features are
> implemented. Looking through the tests in languages/perl6/t/ is a bit
> disappointing as some things I know have been implemented aren't there
> (e.g., types on sub signatu
Yeah, it's runtime.t
top - 11:14:36 up 1 day, 3:37, 4 users, load average: 1.11, 0.75, 0.34
Tasks: 95 total, 2 running, 93 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 14.8% us, 35.5% sy, 0.0% ni, 49.7% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 2074556k total, 1251040k used, 823516k free,
24 matches
Mail list logo
