Re: [perl #55184] The presence of $_ in programs produces an error

Patrick (>), Carl (>>): >> The attached patch fixes the bug #55184: "The presence of $_ in >> programs produces an error", reported a while back. >> >> >> >> It's a limited fix, and I'd be happy to hear how it could be improved. >> All rak

Re: [perl #56006] Test failures on Solaris10-x86

On Thursday 19 June 2008 20:33:31 James Keenan via RT wrote: > > In Perl 5, what is the value for $^O on your system? (I'd like to have > it for doing a SKIP on the TODO passing test above.) perses% perl -e 'print "$^O\n";' solaris - Andrew -- Talk is cheap. Show me the code. -- Linus Torvalds

Re: Graph for Rakudo Blog Post about Passing Tests

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:56:09PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote: > Ovid wrote: > > However, from a testing perspective, I'm wondering why > > there is such a huge number of skipped tasks. Shouldn't those be TODO > > tasks? > > Mostly because the skipped tests are parse failures or throw runtime > e

RE: Graph for Rakudo Blog Post about Passing Tests

> From: Moritz Lenz > > Attached is an updated version, as well as an example chart it creates. > This is not as pretty as the previous version, but it's more > informative. > If there are significant number of failed tests, I could also include > their number. > > Any comments? In line with what

[perl #56006] [BUG]: Test failures on Solaris10-x86

On Thu Jun 19 22:47:58 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Some of the other TODO tests use code like: > > my @todo; > @todo = ( todo => 'some reason' ) if $^O =~ /SomePlatform/; > > some_test_assertion( $expect, $receive, $description, @todo ); > > This seems appropriate here

Re: Graph for Rakudo Blog Post about Passing Tests

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 03:13:37PM -0700, Conrad Schneiker wrote: > > From: Moritz Lenz > > > > Attached is an updated version, as well as an example chart it creates. > > This is not as pretty as the previous version, but it's more > > informative. > > If there are significant number of failed tes

[perl #56152] Darwin 10.5.3 x86 rel 28576 - test codingstd/perlcritic - assuming ProhibitAmbiguousNames::default_forbidden_names() in Perl::Critic 1.03

# New Ticket Created by "Andy Bach" # Please include the string: [perl #56152] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56152 > prove -v t/codingstd/perlcritic.t t/codingstd/perlcritic..Undefined subroutine &Perl:

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r14553 - doc/trunk/design/syn

Author: pmichaud Date: Fri Jun 20 19:56:43 2008 New Revision: 14553 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod Log: typo fixes by diakopter++ Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod == --- doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r14554 - doc/trunk/design/syn

Author: pmichaud Date: Fri Jun 20 19:57:20 2008 New Revision: 14554 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod Log: typo fixes by diakopter++ Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod == --- doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod

Re: Status of Plumhead (licensing considerations)

Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote: Have you thought about license implications? 'genskel.pl' seems to take code snippets from PHP source. Best regards, Bernhard Schmalhofer (I'm replying separately to the two threads in this message.) As far as I can tell, copying the code for a function signat

Re: [perl #56110] [PATCH] Warnings on Solaris

On Thursday 19 June 2008 15:33:14 Parrot via RT wrote: > "src/packfile.c", line 351: warning: argument #1 is incompatible with > prototype: >         prototype: pointer to char : "/usr/include/sys/mman.h", line 161 >         argument : pointer to long > "src/packfile.c", line 878: warning: argument