Allison:
1. Are you still experiencing these problems?
2. Since you said that these problems occurred after an upgrade, can I
assume that you're working on PPC?
3. Have you had a chance to look at the related ticket I mentioned in
my last post?
Thanks.
kid51
On Sat Mar 29 08:41:56 2008, rblasch wrote:
>
> t/op/sprintf.t
> not ok 157 - [%.0g] C99 standard mandates minus sign but C89 does not
> skip: MSWin32 VMS hpux:10.20 openbsd netbsd:1.5 irix actual: >0<
>
This particular TODO-ed test has begun to "unexpectedly" PASS for me on
linux-i386 and darw
On Tue Jun 17 17:12:30 2008, japhb wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:27 -0700, Packy Anderson wrote:
> > Here's the command I'm using to configure and make
> > $ make realclean; CC="gcc-4.0" CX="g++-4.0" perl Configure.pl --
> > cc="$CC" --cxx="$CX" --link="$CX" --ld="$CX" --optimize; make -j 2
>
On Tue Jun 17 17:12:30 2008, japhb wrote:
* Does it still fail if you don't override the compiler and linker?
* Does it still fail if you don't run a parallel make?
* Does it still fail if you don't configure with --optimize?
* Does it still fail for just 'make realclean; perl Configure.pl;
mak
# New Ticket Created by Geoffrey Broadwell
# Please include the string: [perl #55978]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55978 >
The attached patch is courtesy of donaldh++. It has been tested on
cygwin and Deb
On Tue Jun 17 17:12:30 2008, japhb wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:27 -0700, Packy Anderson wrote:
> > Here's the command I'm using to configure and make
> > $ make realclean; CC="gcc-4.0" CX="g++-4.0" perl Configure.pl --
> > cc="$CC" --cxx="$CX" --link="$CX" --ld="$CX" --optimize; make -j 2
>
Raphael Descamps (via RT) wrote:
> Attached patch modify chop.t to add one file and four more successful
> tests to spectest_regression.
Applied as r20859 of the pugs repository, thank you.
Note that the spec tests live in the pugs repository (
http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/t/spec to more specific
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 21:06:58 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> Index: src/dynext.c
> ===
> --- src/dynext.c(revision 28459)
> +++ src/dynext.c(working copy)
> @@ -276,12 +276,10 @@
> /* And on cygwin replace a lea
On Tue Jun 17 21:06:58 2008, japhb wrote:
> The attached patch is courtesy of donaldh++. It has been tested on
> cygwin and Debian/i686. Please someone test on Mac OS X, so that I can
> commit it.
>
Works for me on Mac OS X 10.4 (Panther) on PPC.
kid51
On Sun May 25 13:15:10 2008, tetragon wrote:
> And here's a newer version of the patch that I use. This one changes
> config/init/hints/darwin.pm instead of config/init/defaults.pm
Patch applied to trunk in r28513. Thanks to tetragon, testers who have
posted so far, and participants in Parrot/R
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 09:06 -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 June 2008 21:06:58 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>
> > Index: src/dynext.c
> > ===
> > --- src/dynext.c(revision 28459)
> > +++ src/dynext.c(working cop
This patch fixes a test suite failure in t/codingstd/perlcritic.t
The minimum required version for Perl::Critic was 1.03, but the
&default_forbidden_words method was not introduced until 1.082. I've
bumped up the version number in the test to ensure it skips properly.
Also, the Perl::Critic docs
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:18:40PM -0700, Chris Fields wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Chris Fields
> # Please include the string: [perl #55962]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55962 >
>
> This is actuall
Hello,
I'm Adrian, the Summer of Code student who is working on the test suite hosted
in the Pugs repo. You might have seen me on IRC as Auzon.
A while back, I started a file (pugs/t/TASKS) in the repository to hold a list
of things that need to be done on the test suite. I want to make it easi
Hi,
If system() is now called run()
What replaces backtick or qx{} ?
Gabor
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:45:24AM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote:
: Hi,
:
: If system() is now called run()
:
: What replaces backtick or qx{} ?
qqx[] or qq:x[] would be the exact equivalent. qx[] or q:x[] would
be the same with single-quote semantics. (There are probably no
backticks for that purp
16 matches
Mail list logo
