[perl #54602] [PATCH] Several changes to allow C++ compiling

2008-05-23 Thread Seneca Cunningham via RT
On Thu May 22 21:08:01 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wednesday 21 May 2008 13:04:29 NotFound wrote: > > Changed several casts and removed 'extern' is several places in > > congruence with the changed meaning of the macros. > > Hi, > > Sounds like this part of the patch has some portability

[perl #54694] PCT tutorial improvements (Lesson 1)

2008-05-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Christoph Otto # Please include the string: [perl #54694] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=54694 > As an enthusiastic newbie, I was very glad when kjs posted his tutorial on the PCT.

question tutorial/license

2008-05-23 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
Hi, I'm converting the tutorial on the PCT to POD files, so they can be added to languages/squaak/doc. I do have a question on the license; not sure if this is an issue. I put the tutorial in the public domain, by adding a section 'license' below each episode, like so: The source code in this tu

[perl #54704] [TODO] remove link to non-existing document parrot strings on site

2008-05-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol # Please include the string: [perl #54704] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=54704 > on http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/ there is still a link to Parrot strings. This docum

Re: [perl #46499] [RFE] Allow comment lines in PIR .param list

2008-05-23 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Will Coleda via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed Oct 17 12:09:54 2007, bernhard wrote: >> Currently following PIR is failing because of the '#' in the '.param' list. >> >> .sub main :main >> >> ( $S1 ) = my_sub( 'hello', 'world' ) >> say $S1 >> .end >> >>

Re: [perl #54602] [PATCH] Several changes to allow C++ compiling

2008-05-23 Thread NotFound
Looking better at the Parrot_exec_rel_... vars, they are not intended to be exported at all, they are globals for private usage between exec and jit, so they don't need the API or DATA things. This patch cleans it, make sure they are defined only in jit.c and declared as extern in the others, and a

[perl #54704] [TODO] remove link to non-existing document parrot strings on site

2008-05-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Fixed, thanks!

[perl #54712] [TODO] remove stack ops page

2008-05-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol # Please include the string: [perl #54712] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=54712 > the stack ops have been removed, the page describing these is empty now and can be rem

[perl #54712] [TODO] remove stack ops page

2008-05-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Thanks for reporting, fixed.

Re: [perl #46499] [RFE] Allow comment lines in PIR .param list

2008-05-23 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> IIRC, the blank line stuff in .param lines has to do with the >> helper_state non-terminal; this is a kludge to make things work >> currently,

[perl #54716] [BUG] Several tests fail for new "Mutable" PMC

2008-05-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andrew Whitworth # Please include the string: [perl #54716] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=54716 > Several tests (mostly codingstd) are failing for the new mutable PMC and related fil

[perl #54602] [PATCH] Several changes to allow C++ compiling

2008-05-23 Thread Mark Glines via RT
On Fri May 23 07:57:11 2008, julianalbo wrote: > Reopened waiting for testing and commiting the patch to sove the problems. All tests successful on linux/amd64. Mark

[perl #54724] result of 'reverse'-ing a string is not a 'Perl6Str'

2008-05-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Chris Fields # Please include the string: [perl #54724] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=54724 > Using 'reverse' returns a Str which is-a 'String', not a 'Perl6Str'. Using the attach

[perl #54736] error on winxp with perl6.exe 0.6.2

2008-05-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by herbert breunung # Please include the string: [perl #54736] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=54736 > a simple say 6; throws Null PMC access in isa() current instr.: 'parrot;Perl6Obje

[perl #54734] make perl6 failing on Revision: 27774 (Ubuntu 8.06)

2008-05-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Please include the string: [perl #54734] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=54734 > All tests successful, 27 tests and 594 subtests skipped. Files=583, Tests=11271, 31

[perl #39827] [TODO] [CAGE] implement is_abs_path()

2008-05-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Thu Jul 13 11:31:41 2006, coke wrote: > Need a C-level routine to determine if a given path is an absolute > path on the current (compiling) system. > > -- > Will "Coke" Coleda > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > donaldh++ points out that this exists in src/library.c; For quite some time, apparently.

Re: [perl #54734] make perl6 failing on Revision: 27774 (Ubuntu 8.06)

2008-05-23 Thread Moritz Lenz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (via RT) wrote: > gmake[1]: *** No rule to make target `src/pmc/mutable.pmc.template', > needed by `src/pmc/mutable.pmc'. Stop. Thanks for reporting, attached patch (+ 'make Makefile') fixes this for me. -- Moritz Lenz http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/ Index: con

[perl #54734] make perl6 failing on Revision: 27774 (Ubuntu 8.06)

2008-05-23 Thread Mark Glines via RT
On Fri May 23 15:30:15 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for reporting, attached patch (+ 'make Makefile') fixes this for me. Thanks, applied in r27775.

Re: [perl #54678] [BUG] \h \H \v \V seem silently missing from PGE

2008-05-23 Thread Stéphane Payrard
Double mistake from me. I used the wrong keyword 'rule' instead of 'token'. So the characters matching \h were already gone. Then I looked the implementation at the wrong place concluding falsely. There is no bug. -- cognominal stef

[perl #54716] [BUG] Several tests fail for new "Mutable" PMC

2008-05-23 Thread James Keenan via RT
I fixed these today before I knew that an RT had been opened. Andrew: Can you confirm they're fixed and, if so, resolve ticket? Thanks. kid51