Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Sat Mar 15 10:50:04 2008, doughera wrote:
Ah, I think this one is easy: If I recall correctly, the SHA256_CTX
stuff was added in openssl version 0.9.8; I'll bet your system has
0.9.7.
Yes.
OpenSSL> version
OpenSSL 0.
chromatic wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2008 07:24:44 François Perrad wrote:
chromatic wrote:
I fixed all of the compilation errors I could find as of r26285. 280
tests fail on the trunk for me and 308 fail on the branch, but they don't
look like compilation errors or PDD 17 porting errors.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:04 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 23 February 2008 14:23:19 Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The issue seems to be caused by languages/c99/src/preamble, where:
> > >
> >
Not long ago, Allison Randal via RT proclaimed...
> On Mon Feb 20 16:23:46 2006, jhoblitt at hawaii.edu wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:03:59AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > >
> > > On Feb 20, 2006, at 23:44, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> > >
> > > >What happened to the factorial PASM
This was never actually a bug, afaict.
# New Ticket Created by Matt Kraai
# Please include the string: [perl #51806]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51806 >
Howdy,
t/examples/pasm.t fails because examples/pasm/fact.pasm now outputs 30
factorials,
On Sun Mar 16 10:17:09 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Friends,
>
> Doing cage cleaning today, I noticed that there has been no activity in
> this thread since last August. Are the issues that were under
> discussion still "live"? Should we still be considering the various
> patches?
The issue
On Sun Mar 16 19:28:53 2008, kraai wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> t/examples/pasm.t fails because examples/pasm/fact.pasm now outputs 30
> factorials, whereas the test case only expects it to output 6.
I was just at the point of filing a separate bug report on the failure
in t/examples/pasm.t when I saw yo
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Mar 17 13:00:02 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with m
Testing URM, that is
cd languages/urm && make test
and
cd languages && perl t/harness --languages=urm
should work again in r26422.
Could somebody check with older versions of Test::More ?
Regards,
Bernhard
--
/* [EMAIL PROTECTED] */
I don't see this with Windows XP, VC++ 8.0, VC++ 9.0 or MinGW GCC 3.4.2,
using Parrot r26446. All three nmake/mingw32-make test in
languages/perl6 report:
All tests successful.
Files=27, Tests=223, 37 wallclock secs ( 0.13 usr + 0.00 sys = 0.13 CPU)
Result: PASS
The GC bug is either solved or
Seems like there was a symbol missing.
src\io\io_win32.c: At top level:
src\io\io_win32.c:389: warning: no previous prototype for 'PIO_win32_isatty'
src\io\io_win32.c:389: error: conflicting types for 'PIO_win32_isatty'
src\io\io_win32.c:341: error: previous implicit declaration of
'PIO_win32_isat
Fixed by guarding the assertion with PARROT_HAS_ALIGNED_FUNCPTR at r22453.
I couldn't find the problem when I wrote it, I think you can resolve
the problem, I can always resend it if I have time to find a
solution.
Thanks.
2008/3/16, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> chromatic, allison:
>
> Are the issues raised by this patch still relevant? (No activity in
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:28:26AM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Sun Mar 16 19:28:53 2008, kraai wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > t/examples/pasm.t fails because examples/pasm/fact.pasm now outputs 30
> > factorials, whereas the test case only expects it to output 6.
>
>
> I was just at the po
On Mon Mar 17 09:16:37 2008, kraai wrote:
>
> > > t/perl/Parrot_IO.t fails because it skips the Subversion-specific
> > > tests only when run in a Subversion working copy. The attached patch
> > > fixes both problems.
> > >
> >
> > Perhaps because I'm usually working in a Subversion working co
On Mon Mar 17 09:34:24 2008, cognominal wrote:
> $?SUB is not reset between two evals so the outer to an undefined
> block. I am not sure this is
> the best place to reset $?SUB.
> At least if seems to fix the bug.
>
>
> Index: /Users/stef/svn/parrot/compilers/pct/src/PAST/Compiler.pir
> ==
On Thu Dec 13 17:47:05 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 20:41:08 chromatic wrote:
>
> > Here's a first step. I added a stripped-down version of the code in RT
> > #48467 as a second test, and it fails for me with:
> >
> > set_pmc() not implemented in class 'Num'
>
Author: larry
Date: Mon Mar 17 10:37:26 2008
New Revision: 14522
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
Log:
Various typos and suggest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> +++ doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod Mon Mar 17 10:37:26 2008
> +infinite memory, and are willing to wait a long time. To expand an
> +interator object to completion, iterate it with C<< prefix:<=> >>
Typo -- I believe that should be "iterator".
> +++ doc/trunk/desig
Author: larry
Date: Mon Mar 17 12:36:21 2008
New Revision: 14523
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
typos from Aaron Crane++
more (assignment, self-extending array, reification).semantics
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Parrot 0.6.0 will be released tomorrow.
Committers, don't miss your chance to bring the messages accross in
NEW, CREDITS, PLATFORMS and LANGUAGES_STATUS.
Regards,
Bernhard Schmalhofer
Hi
I think this is not new to anyone, but as parrot 0.6.0 is preparing to
exit the cage, here is some information about running make test on
latest svn r26457.
Linux 2.6.24, x86:
All tests successful.
Files=559, Tests=11128, 327 wallclock secs ( 5.32 usr 1.21 sys +
242.19 cusr 48.13 csys
On Monday 17 March 2008 14:29:19 Alberto Simões wrote:
> I think this is not new to anyone, but as parrot 0.6.0 is preparing to
> exit the cage, here is some information about running make test on
> latest svn r26457.
> Darwin 10.5.2:
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/src/io.t
chromatic wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2008 14:29:19 Alberto Simões wrote:
I think this is not new to anyone, but as parrot 0.6.0 is preparing to
exit the cage, here is some information about running make test on
latest svn r26457.
Darwin 10.5.2:
Test Summary Report
---
t/src/io
chromatic wrote:
We have some 845 open tickets in RT, which is approximately 840 more than I'd
like to see at any one time. I closed a dozen or so today. If every active
committer could close one or two every week, we'd make real progress very
shortly.
And if you *really* have tuits avail
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Will Coleda via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Mar 17 09:34:24 2008, cognominal wrote:
> > $?SUB is not reset between two evals so the outer to an undefined
> > block. I am not sure this is
> > the best place to reset $?SUB.
> > At least if seems to f
On Mon Mar 17 08:21:14 2008, nahoo wrote:
> I couldn't find the problem when I wrote it, I think you can resolve
> the problem, I can always resend it if I have time to find a
> solution.
>
Thanks, Rubén. If I don't hear anything contrary from others, I'll
resolve the ticket after this week's r
On Mon May 01 06:47:17 2006, bernhard wrote:
> In 'include/parrot/parrot.h' it quite sensibly says:
>
> /* Only parrot core files should include this file.
>Extensions should include .
>Programs embedding parrot should include .
> */
>
> However all dynamic PMCs in src/dynpmc and most, if
On Sat Nov 12 09:22:47 2005, leo wrote:
> Not the first time I or somenone else ran into the problem of editing an
> autogenerated file. Creating these files r/o would prevent from
> accidental changes.
>
If someone could flesh out the intent of this ticket a bit more, I
suspect someone fluent
On Mon Jan 09 17:05:30 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Simple profile suggests that pmc2c.pl is spending about 25% of it's
> total execution time loading FindBin. The lib path use of FindBin::Bin
> can be replaced with 'use lib qw( . lib ../lib ../../lib );' while the
> other uses of FindBin::Bin
As part of cage cleaning, I am attempting to determine whether the
issues raised in this long untouched RT are still pertinent.
Here are mentions of 'runtime/parrot/include' in the config/ hierarchy.
$ fns config | xargs grep -n 'runtime/parrot/include'
config/auto/signal.pm:70:my $signalpa
On Mon Sep 26 21:09:20 2005, jhoblitt wrote:
>
> So would you like to merge this with 31554 or just close them both?
>
RT 31554 was marked Obsolete by Leo in October 2005. Can anyone assess
the current pertinence of the issues raised in this ticket?
Thank you very much.
kid51
On Wed May 17 16:16:42 2006, coke wrote:
> I think that's a red herring. I'm not talking about being insensitive
> to case, but being completely ignorant of it. pmc2c.pl is *changing
> the case* and therefore breaking things. Especially on filesystems
> that are case-insensitive (because it l
On Monday 17 March 2008 16:20:42 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> If someone could flesh out the intent of this ticket a bit more, I
> suspect someone fluent in Perl 5 could take it, since most files are
> written by Perl 5 processes.
>
> Some guidance as to how to create read-only files on various OS
I re-examined this patch tonight, cleaned it up a bit, and corrected two
spelling errors in test messages (s/verfiy/verify/g). The file passes
all tests on both Linux and Darwin.
I'll apply the patch attached after the release if no one objects.
Thank you very much.
kid51
Index: t/pmc/objects.
From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:54:02 -0700
I had to add "set modeline" to my .vimrc, but now generated files
respect the line:
/* ex: set ro:
... when I edit them with Vim.
And adding "buffer-read-only: t" to "Local variables:" at the end
James,
Profiling is generally done with Devel::Profile.
http://search.cpan.org/~jaw/Devel-Profile-1.05/Profile.pm
Since pmc2c.pl is invoked so many times in the build process improving
it's performance would sustainably speed up the overall build time.
Cheers,
-J
--
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04
On Sat Dec 16 21:56:15 2006, allison wrote:
> Adequately covered by PDD 13. Leaving ticket to Jonathan to close when
> implemented.
Your cage cleaner wants to know ... has this been implemented?
Thank you very much.
kid51
On Fri Nov 11 11:41:28 2005, particle wrote:
> > [leo - Tue May 10 05:13:47 2005]:
> [above code snipped]
> > As a starter an equivalent of File::Spec::catfile() would suffice to be
> > able to rewrite above code.
> >
> File::Spec::catdir() has been implemented for win32. catfile() is coming
> so
On Tue Feb 20 00:31:58 2007, kjs wrote:
> Fortunately, in this case it looks to me as though t/pmc/sub.t
> does have tests that check for proper execution of multiple
> :load subs. So I think this ticket can be safely closed.
>
Jonathan, Patrick, kjs: Can the ticket be closed?
Thank you ver
This ticket was apparently never closed when it should have been back in
Dec 2006. Doing so now.
kid51
On Wed Jul 05 00:24:34 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Done, and I also added Vishal as a requestor on the relevant tickets.
>
The discussion appears to have been wrapped up, but the ticket was never
resolved. Can we do so now?
Thank you very much.
kid51
On Tue Jul 04 23:25:37 2006, mdiep wrote:
> The following commands are implemented but have no tests:
>
> after
> binary
> close
> file
> gets
> lrange
> open
>
Since I don't know TCL, I can't evaluate how well these commands have
been tested. But in languages/tcl/t, I see tests whose names ref
On Fri Jul 07 18:39:17 2006, coke wrote:
> Proposed design: simply have multiple sections in the code that start
> with []. it's visually
> distinctive, and allows you to keep the code for each subcommand
> *near* that subcommand.
Cage cleaner wants to know: Can we get an update on this ticket?
On Sun Jul 16 15:12:44 2006, mdiep wrote:
[snip]
> This is a temporary hack that creates the ::tcl namespace. The sub is
> required to make Parrot actually create the namespace. This should be
> replaced with code (elsewhere) that actually populates the ::tcl with
> whatever it's supposed to
This ticket hasn't been touched in going on two years, but it was
phrased very generally.
Can anyone provide a description of the opcodes that would need testing
and/or how far we've gotten?
Thank you very much.
kid51
Author: larry
Date: Mon Mar 17 21:57:04 2008
New Revision: 14524
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
typo from spinclad++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod(ori
On Sunday 16 March 2008 06:57:32 Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> running 'make fulltest' under Linux leaves me with segfaults for
> gdbmhast.t.
>
> t/dynpmc/foo.ok
> t/dynpmc/gdbmhash
> # Failed test 'get_integer'
> # at t/dynpmc/gdbmhash.t lin
On Monday 17 March 2008 22:26:01 chromatic wrote:
> Parrot_MD5_init() isn't getting called, for some reason. That's why the
> PMC_data() of this PMC is null when initializing the MD5 library.
... and that's because the predereferencing code (parrot_PIC_prederef() in
src/pic.c) optimizes new_p_s
50 matches
Mail list logo
