I'll merge the pdd17pmc branch back into trunk tomorrow morning, if I
don't hear any show-stoppers by then.
Allison
# New Ticket Created by "Jesse Taylor"
# Please include the string: [perl #51566]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51566 >
I'm having problems understanding what the last two lines in the following
code segmen
t/src/intlist.c has been passing on Darwin for me (PPC, OS X 10.4.11)
since Feb 19, so I am closing the ticket. Merged #51000 into it,
thereby resolving that ticket as well.
kid51
A developer who recently attended Perl Seminar NY asked me this
question, to which I didn't have the answer.
Hi James,
Is Parrot embeddable into C programs, like Perl is ?
Can anyone advise? Thanks.
jimk
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:11 PM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A developer who recently attended Perl Seminar NY asked me this
> question, to which I didn't have the answer.
>
> > Hi James,
> >
> > Is Parrot embeddable into C programs, like Perl is ?
> >
> >
>
> Can anyone
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Mar 10 13:00:02 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with m
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:32 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2008 02:22:58 François Perrad wrote:
>
>
> > but WMLScript PMCs don't compile :
> > many error like
> > .\wmlsinteger.pmc: In function `Parrot_WmlsInteger_subtract_WmlsString':
> > .\wmlsinteger.pmc:251:
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2008 02:22:58 François Perrad wrote:
but WMLScript PMCs don't compile :
many error like
.\wmlsinteger.pmc: In function `Parrot_WmlsInteger_subtract_WmlsString':
.\wmlsinteger.pmc:251: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
I fixed all of the compil
Everyone jump on board and get all the flags and warnings I've been
enjoying for months now!
Not that I remember exactly what they are. But there ARE some!
xoxo,
Andy
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: March 10, 2008 5:21:34 AM CDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
I'm working on a tutorial for using the PCT (will be published on
parrotblog.org).
For that purpose I built a case study language, which is simple enough
to understand and implement in a straightforward way, yet it has
enough features to demonstrate the power of the PCT. An important
issue in
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2008 02:22:58 François Perrad wrote:
in r26261 with MinGW32, Lua PMCs seem OK (thank to chromatic).
Several tests fail for me, but it looks like a problem with caller() in Lua,
so it's probably beyond my expertise. It looks simpler to fix (if you know
ho
François Perrad wrote:
I think the problem is in the wmlsbytecode.pmc (a singleton PMC with
only one method 'load'), because the following command has no output :
parrot wmlsd.pir t/examples_1.wmlsc
The script wmlsd.pir is a disassembler that loads a WMLScript bytecode
and dumps it. Other
Will Coleda wrote:
I wanted to call attention to part of today's Parrot Sketch:
- Otherwise, the PMC branch is ready for language testing,
will plan to merge it back into trunk next weekend.
So, language developers (and others); please grab a copy of
https://svn.perl.org/parrot/branches/pdd17p
On Monday 10 March 2008 09:43:11 François Perrad wrote:
> After reverting commit 26097 ([core] Implement does_pmc and ...), I see
> a different behavior between trunk and ppd17pmc :
>
> on trunk :
> parrot --no-gc lua.pbc -e "print(-nil)"
> lua.pbc: EVAL_1:30: attempt to perform arithmetic on a ni
François Perrad wrote:
After reverting commit 26097 ([core] Implement does_pmc and ...),
Why revert it? The behavior wasn't quite right, but we fixed it in the
pdd17pmc branch.
The compiler generates :
- a call to VTABLE_neg (in luaany.pmc) when "print(-nil)"
- a call to METHOD len (in
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was mentioned on a ticket, but to add it to this thread: tcl
> seems to work as well in this branch as it does in trunk now,
> chromatic++.
>
> --
> Will "Coke" Coleda
>
Closer inspection shows that partcl is not fa
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This was mentioned on a ticket, but to add it to this thread: tcl
> > seems to work as well in this branch as it does in trunk now,
> > chromati
On Monday 10 March 2008 12:37:50 Will Coleda wrote:
> The conversion of tcllist.pmc to PDD17 isn't complete: there are
> currently several invocations of String's replace method which in
> trunk is the old C-style METHOD but in branch, is the new PDD17 style
> METHOD. I tried to replace these, for
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:52 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008 12:37:50 Will Coleda wrote:
>
> > The conversion of tcllist.pmc to PDD17 isn't complete: there are
> > currently several invocations of String's replace method which in
> > trunk is the old C-style ME
On Monday 10 March 2008 13:19:59 Will Coleda wrote:
> Note that:
> > > +STRING* orig,repl;
>
> doesn't DWIM.
That's why abutting the star and the type is an abomination under heaven, and
our style guidelines recommend strongly against it.
> Also, if you're not careful, pmc2c.pl tries t
On Monday 10 March 2008 13:51:40 Will Coleda wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 10 March 2008 13:19:59 Will Coleda wrote:
> > > Also, if you're not careful, pmc2c.pl tries to rewrite
> > > Parrot_PCCINVOKE too, not just PCCINVOKE. (I us
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008 13:19:59 Will Coleda wrote:
>
> > Note that:
> > > > +STRING* orig,repl;
> >
> > doesn't DWIM.
>
> That's why abutting the star and the type is an abomination under heaven, and
> our style
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:04 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008 13:51:40 Will Coleda wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Monday 10 March 2008 13:19:59 Will Coleda wrote:
>
>
> > > > Also, if you're not care
On Monday 10 March 2008 14:31:27 Will Coleda wrote:
> I know "replace" is invalid (that's why I marked it with a comment).
> That doesn't stop pmc2c.pl from trying to convert that invocation of
> Parrot_PCCINVOKE when it shouldn't.
The regex is in lib/Parrot/Pmc2c/PCCMETHOD.pm, specifically
rewr
[oops; continuation 0xb6926320 of type 22 is trying to jump from
runloop 15008 to runloop 1]
Before I file a bug report on the tcl code that exposes this
faux-warning[1], I wanted to double check: Is this an issue anymore
after the recent scheduler/task/event loop fixes? (The warning comes
from sr
On Sun Feb 24 21:54:31 2008, petergibbs wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Perl6 Internals"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 4:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [perl #51136] [BUG] Segfault in Parrot_Ref_morph
>
>
From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:43:58 -0500
[oops; continuation 0xb6926320 of type 22 is trying to jump from
runloop 15008 to runloop 1]
Before I file a bug report on the tcl code that exposes this
faux-warning[1], I wanted to double check: Is t
For the record, here's what the tests are doing on Linux as of r26279:
# 'cc -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-E t/src/io_16.o src/parrot_config.o -o
t/src/io_16 -Wl,-rpath=/home/jimk/work/parrot/blib/lib -Lblib/lib
-lparrot -lnsl -ldl -lm -lcrypt -lutil -lpthread -lrt' failed with exit
code 1
# Failed to
On Sat Jan 19 21:06:00 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is, surprisingly, the same bug as #49762; Tickets merged.
Friends,
Did this error persist with Parrot 5.3 on ppc/OS X 10.5.1?
kid51
On Sat Dec 01 10:49:24 2007, coke wrote:
> I don't normally build on windows, but tried today to verify some code
for
> kid51; started by doing a basic build against trunk:
>
> winxp, visual studio 2005, r23314
>
> Build ends with:
>
> ..\..\parrot.exe ..\..\compilers\tge\tgc.pir --output=PO
2008/3/10 Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:43:58 -0500
>
>
>[oops; continuation 0xb6926320 of type 22 is trying to jump from
>runloop 15008 to runloop 1]
>
>Before I file a bug report on the tcl code that exposes
31 matches
Mail list logo
